Tuesday, October 6, 2015

The United States of Asininity:The World's Silliest Empire

By dmitry Orlov

I couldn't help but notice that over the past few weeks the Empire has become extremely silly—so silly that I believe it deserves the title of the World's Silliest Empire. One could claim that it has been silly before, but recent developments seem to signal a quantum leap in its silliness level.

The first bit of extreme silliness surfaced when Gen. Lloyd J. Austin III, the head of the United States Central Command, told a Senate panel that only a very small number of Syrian fighters trained by the United States remained in the fight—perhaps as few as five. The tab for training and equipping them was $500 million. That's $100 million per fighter, but that's OK, because it's all good as long as the military contractors are getting paid. Things got even sillier when it later turned out that even these few fighters got car-jacked by ISIS/al Qaeda in Syria (whatever they are currently calling themselves) and got their vehicles and weapons taken away from them.

Gen. Austin
General Austin's previous role as as Lt. General Casey in Tim Burton's film Mars Attacks! It was already a very silly role, but his current role is a definite career advancement, both in terms of rank and in terms of silliness level.

Lt. Gen. Casey
Mars Attacks!
The next silly moment arrived at the UN General Assembly meeting in New York, where Obama, who went on for 30 minutes instead of the allotted 15 (does Mr. Silly President know how to read a clock?) managed to use up all of this time and say absolutely nothing that made any sense to anyone.

But it was Putin's speech that laid out the Empire's silliness for all to see when he scolded the US for making a bloody mess of the Middle East with its ham-handed interventions. The oft-repeated quote is “Do you understand what you have done?” but that's not quite right. The Russian «Вы хоть понимаете теперь, чего вы натворили?» can be more accurately translated as “How can you even now fail to understand what a mess you have made?” Words matter: this is not how one talks to a superpower before an assembly of the world's leaders; this is how one scolds a stupid and wayward child. In the eyes of the whole world, this made the Empire look rather silly.

Read more

Monday, October 5, 2015

Immigration: Treason and the War for the Destruction of the West

Ram Z Paul: Germany threatens to take children from parents who oppose their own racial and cultural genocide by mass immigration and multiculturalism

Occidental Observer: Mark Zuckerberg's Suckerbook to help Merkel crush free speech in Germany

Breitbart: Hillary to give up on New Hampshire — too white?
White Americans must be cluing in to the treason of the Bush/Klington elites: they intend to destroy us.
Irish Savant: The enemy within

Deep Resource: Germans chant: "Putin to Berlin, Merkel to Siberia!" at Dresden Rally in Germany

Poznavatelnoe: Nikolai Starikov explains Europe's refugee crisis

Deep Resource: Germany is committing suicide

Toronto Sun: Rising numbers of Syrian refugees return home as conditions in host countries worsen
What kind of refugee is it that spurns the hospitality of the country offering them safe haven and says, "stuff this, I'm going home." 
Deep Resource: "Syrian" refugees complain of slow Internet in Germany

Bloomberg: Breedlove — Putin Has His Own No-Fly Zone in Syria, Which the US Air Force Cannot Penetrate

Irish Savant: The enemy within

The Saker: The Syrian War, Refugees and Gold

Yahoo News: Tip of the iceberg: No end in sight to migrant wave

Renegade Tribune: Thousands of Germans March to the Border to Protect it from Islamic Invaders

Migrants: Is Mutti Merkel ‘Our Lady of Immigration’ or the Nemesis of Europe?

Angela Merkel and the Death of Germany





Sunday, October 4, 2015

Hillary Turns Hitlery, But Russian Planes in Syria Mark the Start of Cold War II, Not the Launch of World War III

Hillary Clinton speaking with NBC affiliate WHDH in Boston after a campaign event nearby, joins Carli Fiorina in calling for war with Russia in Syria:
I personally would be advocating now for a no-fly zone and humanitarian corridors to try to stop the carnage on the ground and from the air, to try to provide some way to take stock of what’s happening, to try to stem the flow of refugees. 
Are aging women aroused in some way by the thought of sending men in their prime to fight and kill one another? Or are these old bags grasping for power just crazy?

Obama tactfully attributed Clinton's lunatic call for direct confrontation with Russia to the "difference between running for president and being president.” Let's hope he's right, because if anyone were to launch a direct military challenge to Russia's military forces in Syria — which are acting in accordance with international law in response to a request from the legitimate government of that country — we could see Western influence in the World trashed in a day.

A direct air power confrontation between the US and Russia in Syria would place the US in a position reminiscent of Britain's naval confrontation with Germany in 1916, when Britain's main battle fleet met Germany's main battle fleet at what was known as the battle of Jutland. Had the Royal Navy followed traditional British naval policy, to pursue victory at every opportunity, at all costs and by all means, the defeat of Germany might have been achieved in a day. To attempt this, however, would have exposed Britain to a grave risk. The outcome of an all-out battle was uncertain. The British fleet was larger and more heavily armed than the German fleet, but if the Germans proved to have a technological edge, or if they fought with greater skill or good fortune, then it could be the British Navy going to the bottom, a disaster that would have resulted in Britain's inevitable defeat by Germany within weeks. Without a navy to convoy food from the New World and the Empire, Germany's U-boats would have starved Britain into surrender within weeks. The Brits therefore played for the draw that was achieved: not a glorious objective, but the wisest one, given the circumstances.

In Syria, an American no fly zone would bring America's most potent war planes in direct conflict not only with Russia's newly upgraded air force, but against Russia's potentially deadly S300/400 and supersonic S500 anti-aircraft missile batteries. In theory America's aircraft, such as the Lockheed Martin F-22s and F35s are superior to Russian planes in stealth, in battle management software, and in weapons.

But in a fight with the US Air Force, the Russians clearly believe they'd be in it with a chance.
They have low frequency radar with which, it is said, so-called stealth aircraft are easily seen. Moreover in a dogfight, the F35 is slower and less maneuverable than Russia's top fighters. Moreover, the F35's splendid battle management software depends on communication among aircraft throughout the battle zone, communications that, some believe, the Russians have means to jam. Moreover, Russia may also be able to jam American radar, thereby blinding American aircraft to enemy targets.

So here's the risk. In a day, the US could be revealed to the world, as not the greatest power on earth, but a paper tiger. Immediately, friends will become cool, allies will seek other arrangements, vassals will rebel, and enemies will look to exploit their advantage. Under those circumstances, the only rational course for the United States is to adhere to international law and leave Syria to sort out its internal problems in its own way with the aid of whatever friends and allies to whom it appeals for assistance.


RI: France Backs Russia Targeting "All Terrorists" in Syria (i.e., including CIA-backed head-chopping, liver-eating assets)

RI: China to join Russia in blitz on CIA’s proxy jihadists, including ISIS

Tass: Lavrov — Moderate Syrian opposition an American fantasy

RI: Australia FM Is Pushing Long-Refuted Syria Lies

Activist Post: Russia declares Syria "no-float" zone?

RT: ISIS in Syria using mosques as shelters, civilians as shields – Russian Defense Ministry

Press TV: Brzezinski’s comment exposes US assets in Syria: Scholar
John McCane had already exposed the fact that the Syrian opposition militias are CIA assets. Oh, and here's the same admission from the Wall St. Journal.
Live Leak: Russian General — Russia must confront ISIS in Syria to prevent  US Terror-Politics coming to Russia 

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/10/zbigniew-brzezinski-financial-times-op-ed-obama-retaliate-russia-214438#ixzz3nns1Rl66 

Zbig Brzzzinzkizzz: Obama should retaliate if Russia doesn't stop attacking U.S. assets
The United States should threaten to retaliate if Russia does not stop attacking U.S. assets in Syria, 
What Zbiggy is saying is that the US is engaged in a covert war against Syria, which is to say a criminal war of aggression under the Nuremberg standard, and that any country that aids the legitimate government of Syria is defeating America's criminal aggression should suffer American retaliation, even if that country happens to be Russia, the only country in the world able to reduce the United States of America to radio-active ash. 

Fort Russ: Turkey and America support Armenian genocide in Syria; Armenian volunteers support Assad and Putin

Mirror: Putin has sent the feared Spetsnaz special forces into Syria to bail out Assad

Slate: Russia Has Scuttled U.S. Plans in Syria

NYTimes: Russian Soldiers to Join Fight in Syria

Zero Hedge: U.S. Accuses Russia Of Launching Syrian Land Campaign

The Arab Source: ISIS Suffers Disastrous Defeat in Deir Ezzor: Over 150 Terrorists Killed in 24 Hours

RT: Russian Air Force destroys 20 ISIS tanks near Palmyra – Defense Ministry (VIDEOS)

21st Century Wire: ISIS ON THE RUN: Russian Airstrikes Totally Obliterate Terrorist Forces in Just 72 Hours

U-Tube: O'Bomber admits US Trained ISIL head-choppers, and liver eaters

Israel Shamir: If They Are Bombed - They Are Daesh

Channel 4: Syria: Russian air strikes welcomed in Assad's heartland

Renegade Tribune: Thousands of Germans March to the Border to Protect it from Islamic Invaders

Sott.net: Russia will arm Lebanon against ISIS and other extremist groups

Sputnik: Free Syria Army Seeks Russian Alliance

Tass: Russian Foreign Minister calls Free Syrian Army ‘phantom’ group


End of ISIS? Putin 'sending 150,000 soldiers to Syria to WIPE OUT evil Islamic State'

ISIS so weakened by Russian airstrikes and desertion it could be destroyed in HOURS

Sputnik: Islamic militants flee advancing Syrian army

Zero Hedge: Russia Escalates Syria Proxy War: Threatens Full Naval Blockade Of Syria

Zero Hedge: Iran Readies Massive Syrian Ground Invasion

WN: Handelsblatt: Russia strikes serious blow on Washington's reputation

WSWS: France admits it directly supplied arms to Syrian “rebels”

RT: ‘Stop funding ISIS’: Protesters accuse British govt of financing terror groups

WaPo: U.S. will not directly confront Russia in Syria, Obama says

Global Research: Russia Uses High Tech Smart Bombs to Wipe Out US Sponsored Al Qaeda Terrorists. Panic in Rebel Ranks

Tass: Gunmen start withdrawing forces from Syria’s Idlib amid Russian airstrikes

Global Research: British SAS Special Forces “Dressed Up as ISIS Rebels” Fighting Assad in Syria

DM: Putin to Cameron: You must not arm fanatics who eat organs of their enemies
Reacting to comments from Mr Cameron that those arming the Damascus regime had the 'blood of the children of Syria' on their hands, a furious Mr Putin said: 'The blood is on the hands of both parties.
'There is always a question as to who is to blame. One should hardly back those who kill enemies and eat their organs.
'It is hardly in relation to the humanitarian and cultural values Europe has been professing for centuries.' Mr Putin dismissed calls from Mr Cameron and the West to stop arming the regime of dictator Bashar al-Assad, saying Russia was supplying 'the legitimate government of Syria in full compliance with the norms of international law'.
Albawaba: Egypt backs Russian airstrikes in Syria

Intefada: Air Duel between the Sukhoi Su – 30 Russian SM and Israeli F-15

Sputnik: US Spent a Year Bombing Syrian Desert, Not ISIL  Russian MP

FTA: Hawaii Air Guard F-22s Deploy To The Middle East As Tensions With Russia Build

Friday, October 2, 2015

Burying the Underclass

The US Bureau of Labor Statistics reports that the number of individuals out of the work force last month — due to discouragement, retirement or otherwise — represented a substantial 579,000 person increase over the most recent record of 94,031,000, reached in August this year.

The civilian labor force in September clocked in at 156,715,000, declining by 350,000 people, compared to August’s 157,065,000 labor force level.

But not to worry, according to a new report by the US Atlanta Federal Reserve Bank:
The decrease in labor force participation among prime-age individuals has been driven mostly by the share who say they currently don't want a job.
In reality, contrary to soothing bankerspeak, most able-bodied people really do want to earn a living, but an increasing proportion in the West cannot do so because, in this era of offshoring of jobs to Asian sweatshops, their labor is worth less than the minimum wage. To that problem, there are two possible solutions:

One is to eliminate the minimum wage while instituting a negative income tax that insures that the lowest paid worker receives a living wage, an option I discussed here.

The other, if the minimum wage is retained, is for governments to sell job subsidies to employers by competitive auction, as I outlined here.

That no Western state seriously considers either option suggests that, in the enlightened liberal West, governments would prefer the underclass to be underground, dying prematurely due to drug addiction, malnutrition, or criminal violence, with their posterity slaughtered at birth or before, their body parts sold to the highest bidder to keep rich old hypocrites like George Soros the Nazi Jew alive for ever.

As boys of UK Prime Minister David Cameron's old school, Eton, determined in a debating society motion during the 1930's: The Faces of the Poor Should be Ground, a motion that was passed with the amendment that "The Faces of the Poor Should be Underground." As the most privileged youth of England spoke then, so also do all of today's Western elites.


Paul Theroux: The Hypocrisy of ‘Helping’ the Poor

Thursday, October 1, 2015

Scott Free — JFK Board Game

All you need to know about the way Western Democracy works in just 59 seconds:


Monday, September 28, 2015

The Language of Donald Trump

Donald Trump Doesn't do oratory. If you want fine words, consider Carly Fiorina. You'd no more want to debate with Carly than you want to to engage in a spitting contest with a King Cobra. Unfortunately, she's stark staring mad. Putin: "I wouldn't talk to him." No. Just bomb the fucker, I guess.

Then there's Senator Rubio, so extraordinarily articulate, and like Carly, no time for that Commie, I mean fascist, New Hitler, Putin. If I were making a Hollywood blockbuster about the Cold War and a US President who took the world to the brink of nuclear extinction and over the edge, I'd want Rubio to play that president.

And there's JEB. Sure, he's no Lincoln, but for a Bush, boy, he talks a blue streak.

In comparison, Trump just doesn't cut it. Trump's sentences are rarely more than five or ten words:

"I'll make America great again;"
"I'll build a wall;"
"I'd send 'em back;"
"I'll bring the jobs back from Chi'na;"
"NAFTA, I'll renegotiate it or break it."
and on Syria,
"Let Russia handle it"

Those are what, in the instructions to authors of some scholarly journals, you will find described as "short, declarative sentences." They're so simple that it's difficult even for an academic to conceal any lack of sense or substance. And short and declarative seems to be the only type of sentence Donald Trump knows. It ain't pretty, It don't amount to rhetoric, it won't win a debate, but it gets the message across: something you gotta do in business, and what you gotta do in an election if you want that half of the American electorate which has, by definition, an IQ below 100 to understand the message and be motivated to vote on it. For the mass of Americans, unemployed blue collar guys, unemployed black youth, university grads loaded with debt, earning minimum wage if they have a job at all, and still living at home in their late twenties, jobless single mothers raising a family on food stamps, voting for the Trump revolution not only seem like a good idea, it's an idea they can all understand.

Some Other CanSpeccy Posts Viewed Today:

Saturday, September 26, 2015

Why I Have Only Contempt For the Late George Carlin

Carlin's humor seems to have consisted largely in saying "fuck," "shit," and "dick" over and over, while emulating masturbation, and anal penetration, and telling his mainly American audiences how "so fucking dumb" ordinary Americans really are. This is not, for me, the highest form of wit.

In addition, Carlin was for the Couverdon-Kalergi plan for the elimination of the European people as a distinct race of mankind. True, both Carlin and Coverdon-Kalergi did not discriminate agaist white people. Apparently, they wished to destroy all the races of mankind, this to be achieved through mass migration and enforced multiculturalism. Thus, in the"Best of George Carlin" video that I linked to above, there is one frame showing a list of the supposed human races: white, black, brown, yellow, all of which have been struck out and a check marked placed by the words "human race." This is standard globalist propaganda for racial homogenization, based on two fundamental misconceptions or rather deliberate misrepresentations. First,the implication that racial differences are merely a matter skin color, whereas in reality,  skin color is not an essential, or even a greatly important, aspect of human racial differentiation. There are albino Africans, who are nevertheless Africans not Europeans. And there are many people of approximately the same shade of brown who belong to very different racial groups including Dravidians, Amerindians, Australian aboriginals, and deeply suntanned Europeans. Race is determined by differences in many genes and its biological significance has been barely probed. Second, race is not a correct alternative term for species. Mankind is a species not a race, whereas the races of mankind are genetically distinct variants of the human species, which have been created over thousands of years of more or less isolated development through processes of selection, genetic drift and random mutation. The existing vast range of variation in human form, physiology and physiognomy will be irreversibly destroyed within a couple of generations of universal multiracial breeding.

The extinction of my own people as a distinct race and the extraordinary civilization that its sons — people such as Shakespeare, Newton, Francis Bacon, Adam Smith, David Hume, Darwin, James Clerk Maxwell — created, is something to which I am totally opposed. Moreover, I wish other folks — the Chinese, the tribes of Africa, the Jews, the Arabs and many, many others — a long, prosperous, and unique future too.

Inevitably, in the modern, highly connected world, the races of mankind will tend to mix and merge. Insofar as such mixing is the result of individuals acting of their own free will in accordance with law (immigration law, for example), I don't oppose it, and further, I have no hesitation in acknowledging that the progeny of mixed matings may be among the finest people around. The former British settler states, the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand have all, apparently, without great public opposition, adopted the path of multiracial immigration and a pseudo multiculturalism that, in fact, requires all-comers to adopt a politically correct liberal ideology, which accommodates religion only in a depleted and essentially meaningless form. Moreover, in the settler states, there is not only a process of mixing racial groups, but of replacing, albeit over several generations, the existing dominant, European groups with people from elsewhere. The process of replacement is inevitable so long as the fertility of the European populations remains below the replacement rate. In fact, replacement by people from elsewhere is the fate not only of the Europeans, but of all immigrant groups to the settler states and to Europe, since fertility of the native-born is aggressively reduced by programs of indoctrination in school (i.e., the encouragement of masturbation, oral sex, homosexual experimentation, instruction in the use of condoms, etc., all in the name of sex "education"), mass slaughter of the unborn, and girls' education which encourages women, particularly intelligent women, to place careers ahead of motherhood.

If to be succeeded by people from elsewhere is indeed what most Americans, Canadians, etc. want, it's fine with me. But, as all opinion surveys indicate, to be deprived of their own posterity in not what the great majority of Europeans want. But that it is what Europeans are getting. Europeans of Christian tradition have a fertility rate far below the replacement rate and are being displaced by Africans and Asians, the majority of whom are of Islamic or other non-Christian tradition, in a process driven by traitorous leaders subservient to the US empire.

The death of the European peoples as distinct cultural and racial entities may be at hand, but at least let those of us who oppose this genocide not applaud George Carlin, the dead scumbag advocate for the destruction of human cultural and biological diversity.


CanSpeccy: The Unassimilated Indian

CanSpeccy: In Praise of Diversity

CanSpeccy: The Treason of Nicolas Sarkozy: "Métissage" - It's An Obligation!

Monday, September 21, 2015

Guts and Gaba, Bugs and Brains, Allergies and Anxiety

The human gut contains trillions of micro-organisms, bacteria and archaea. Little is known about the relationship between this gut flora or microbiome, and human health, but whereas the gut is susceptible to invasion by pathogens such as Vibrio cholerae (Cholera), ‎Salmonella typhimurium (Typhoid) or Rickettsia prowazekii (typhus), most gut bugs, it seems, either do no harm or yield a positive benefit by aiding the process of digestion or by producing metabolites with positive effects on mental health or immune system function.

The common lactose fermenting organism, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, for example, produces large quantities of the mammalian neuroinhibitor, gamma amino butyric acid, or GABA, with apparently significant psychological effects. Feeding mice with L. rahmnosus produces measurable behavioral changes attributed to a reduction in anxiety, and at least one study with humans has yielded similar results.

Lacto-fermenting bacteria are reported also to suppress food and other allergies and to slow the progression of cancer. And you need no doctor's prescription to use these organisms: you can either buy them at the grocery store or raise them in your own pantry. Unpasterized yogurt, for example, contains the lacto-fermenting microbes: Lactobacillus bulgarius and Streptococcus thermophilus. A much wider, and probably more useful range of organisms is contained in Kefir (a drinkable milk product containing ten or more lacto-fermenting species). Other lacto-fermented products include Kimchi, and sauerkraut, both made chiefly or entirely from cabbage, and fermented drinks such as kvass, made from stale rye bread, beets, fruit juice or just about anything else containing starch or sugar, and Koumis, which is made by fermentation of mare's milk or camel's milk.


Wall St. Journal: How Hard Is It To Milk a Camel

Western Nations Are Committing Suicide to Save Their Economic Lives

A generation of "sex education" has cut the birthrate of the Western nations to well below the replacement rate, and to barely half the replacement rate in Greece, Portugal, and Germany. What's more, the fertility of the indigenous peoples of Europe and the native-born of North America is significantly lower than the overall national rates, which are inflated due to the high fertility or recent immigrants.

But if populations contract, huge chunks of economic activity cease. No need for new schools, hospitals, and universities when you cannot fill the ones you already have. No need for new highways and transportation systems when the existing infrastructure is underused. And the largest impact of all, no need for home construction, which can account for 10% of GDP during a housing boom if the population is shrinking.

Soon be half way there! And Hispanics are counted as white.
Source: White genocide: Racist conspiracy theory or inconvenient truth?
What to do then ? Open the gates, obviously, to those parts of the Third World where populations are exploding, chiefly sub-Saharan Africa and the Muslim World. At least that's what the wise and noble leaders of the West, Obama, Merkel, Hollande, Cameron, etc., have decided. So, say goodbye nations of Europe and goodbye European America, Canada, and Australia. Instead welcome the Islamic, Africanized West.

Alternatively, Europeans could get back in the business of self-replication:

 With a hey, and a ho, and a hey-nonny-no,
These pretty country folks would lie
In springtime, the only pretty ring time,
When birds do sing, Hey ding a ding, ding.

Or more teenage pregnancies, as used to be a mainstay of Western propagation: when lads knew nothing of condoms and a girl submitted, as submit she must, to an irresistible impulse because he really was a sharp lad. The result, one more sharp nipper to carry on the race. That was before Planned Parenthood Cannibalism, and before the state in Europe engaged in the mass slaughter of the unborn or self-genocide.


Breitbart: Pope Francis promotes mass illegal immigration from the Third World to the West

Deep Resource: High Profile Meeting Against European Migration Desaster

Saturday, September 19, 2015

Europe's Useless Fuckers

In response to a post by Aangirfan about Fabians, I commented:
Speaking of Fabians, H.G. Welles and George Bernard Shaw were both Fabians in good standing, and supported the Nazi project for the extermination of useless feeders.

The present day Fabians share that enthusiasm, but they prefer mass immigration, sex education and mass slaughter of the unborn as the method of destroying the useless consuming masses of the European nations.
This prompted a violent reaction from an anonymous troll:
A load of BS. So sex education is bad according to u? Now u have just proved urself indeed a useless eater.
Which seems to confirm that there are still Fabians, and others, intent not only on exterminating those they consider "useless eaters," but who favor the total destruction of the European peoples by mass immigration and multiculturalism, a view that prompts this post.

In speaking of those promoting the genocide of the European nations and the methods they employ, I should perhaps, have put the term sex education in quotes, as by that term I was referring to the mandated promotion of all forms of non-reproductive sex from Kindergarten  and up, in the name of education. As a result of such instruction, Europeans still fuck, presumably, but to little effect: they have been made reproductively dysfunctional. Their fertility is way below the replacement rate. That's why mass immigration combined with such "education," amounts to genocide.

In any other species, frogs, for example, spotted owls, or the Freckled Cypripedium, reproductive dysfunction is generally a matter for widespread concern, but when the result is a reduction in European fertility to barely half the replacement rate, which means population collapse, no one gives a damn, apparently. At the same time, Western instigated political instability, civil war and military invasions in the Third World, where populations are exploding, drives the flow of migrants and the program for European genocide by mass immigration and multiculturalism. The result? Europeans are simply being replaced by people from elsewhere.

It is probable that the multiculturalism is even more lethal to the European peoples than the flood of immigrants. As Europeans perpetuate their anti-Christian death cult (with the full support of the Pope, it seems) Muslims, Animists and practitioners of Voodoo are to maintain their traditional culture, including their polygamous habits and birth rates far in excess of the replacement rate.

The English are already a minority in London, Western Europe's largest city. Three other major British cities, Leicester, Luton and Slough, have ethnic majorities, and in Birmingham, England's second city, the English elementary school children are not even the largest minority.

But stupid people, anonymous trolls, Fabians and liberal bastards insist that opposing the genocide of your own people by mass immigration and multiculturalism is racism, as they seek to force their genocidal program down people's throats by means of propaganda in the guise of "sex education," anti-racism, and the enforcement of tolerance of the alien settlement of one's own land and destruction of one's own civilization. Liberalism now equatews to a virulently anti-white racism intent on genocide.

European civilization abroad is equally threatened: Americans, Canadians, and Australians of European extraction are happy, so the powers that be would have one believe, to die in the knowledge that they will be largely replaced, not by their own posterity, but by people from elsewhere with an alien culture and probably a contempt for Christianity and Western civilization. The same plight faces most other ethnicities making up the populations of the settler nations. They are disposable people, imported to serve the needs of the commercial and industrial system, to be replaced within a generation or two, by new immigrants.

Happily, the indigenous people of Canada, the Innu and other First Nations (Indians), are the most fertile ethnicities in the country and thus have a future in their own homeland yet. Good luck to them, and the indigenous peoples of Australia and the United States.


Selbsthass (Self-Hatred): Esra Levant on Germany's self-hating leader

CanSpeccy: Birth Control, Canadian Style: Or how one Western nation is committing suicide

CanSpeccy: How the West destroys its own

CanSpeccy: Is it right to be racist?

Friday, September 18, 2015

After That Tedious Leaders' Debate: A Real Program For a Better Canada

If you liked what you saw during last night's Globe and Mail party leaders' election debate, no need to read this. But if you found Stephen Harper's grumbling sing-song promise of more one-man, control-freak administration unappealing, if you found Justin Trudeau's ill-humored flailing around, his lips often ahead of his brain, underwhelming, and if you found Tom Mulcair's low-key humor and evident intelligence insufficient to compensate for the inadequacy of the NDP's platform, here's an alternative program.

First, on climate and energy, as I noted here, the Greens have it half right: a carbon tax is — Harper's lying claim to the contrary — the most economically efficient way to cut carbon emissions and should be instituted nationally. It works this way: those for whom cutting emissions is cheaper than paying the tax, will cut their emissions; while those for whom cutting emissions is more costly than paying the tax will continue to emit. That way, we automatically get the biggest emissions reduction per dollar invested. At the same time, those who continue emitting because it is too costly to reduce emissions lose business and thus emit less carbon because the carbon tax raises the cost of their product, or service (e.g., airline flights to international climate-change and environmentalist conferences). A carbon tax means no additional costly bureaucracy, no scope for kick-backs and election funding from favored industries, just the cheapest means of getting as much carbon emissions reduction as you want.

It is true that the carbon tax does, as Stephen Harper inanely reiterated during the latest debate, raise lots of money for governments. But so what? All governments raise revenue, and Stephen Harper's government raises lots of it, $272 billion last year, an increase of $15 billion over the previous year. A carbon tax of ten cents per kilogram would raise around $60 billion, which would be great: it would allow a 50% cut in income tax. Let me say that again, a ten cent a kg carbon emissions tax would allow a 50% cut in income tax.

So second, let's have a 50% cut in income tax, combined with a massive simplification of the tax code. The result? A twenty/twenty tax regime: a $20,000.00 basic personal exemption, and a 20% flat tax on income between twenty and one hundred thousand per year with no exemptions. After that, 40%. Yay, the income tax return could be printed on a post-card (Sorry tax-return preparers).

Third, end unemployment entirely. Here as I outlined before is how it can be done: easily.

The Government auctions job subsidies equal to a living wage. There could be an E-Bay style online auction. Employers bid competitively for the subsidies (for new hires). So if the living hourly wage is, say, $8.00 for a single teenager, or $15,00 for a single mother, and if the work year is 1800 hours, and if, on average, subsidies sell for half the living wage, each subsidy will cost the government between $7000 and $20,000 per year. Assume an average cost of $12,000 per subsidy, the cost of a program creating a million jobs would be a paltry $12 billion, which is practically less than peanuts, for a government that has money to piss away sending fighter jets to Bulgaria, Estonia and Iraq. (And note, by creating several million new jobs, allowing more Canadians to make shoes and shirts, computers and car parts for one another rather than importing them from Asian sweatshops, the program automatically raises the GDP: that means more tax revenue: both GST and income tax paid by the people who profitably employ those receiving the income supplement.)

As for infrastructure, no more Micky Mouse liberal projects to fill the pockets of friends of the party. Let's do something terrific: built a couple of dozen engineered cities without cars, without power poles, with tons of year-round, air-conditioned, communal space with side-walk cafés, playgrounds, parks, trees, but no damn dogs: the kind of place I described here.

In addition, let's have a national online university with vast electronic instructional resources plus tutorial rooms in every community where thousands and thousands of brilliant people in the professions and in business would serve as part-time, volunteer tutors and mentors. That way all young Canadians could pursue education cost-effectively, while simultaneously earning a living and learning the disciplines of the working world.

And yes, of course, the corporation tax should be cut, not a coupla percent, but to nothing. Profits should be taxed in the hands of shareholders when paid out as dividends. The corporation tax is a dumb tax that raises public revenue only by discouraging corporate investment. It exists chiefly because politicians pander to those members of the public who think rich corporations should be made to pay, without realizing that taxing corporations kills jobs. Actually, we want the richest companies in the world, which will be mad to invest more in Canada so that they can become even richer, creating jobs in the process and creating increased demand for labor that drives up wages.

Thursday, September 17, 2015

How the WTC Towers Were Prepped for Demolition?

A large group of artists were given space and construction access to the World Trade Center in the four years leading up to 9/11.

E-Team (Hajoe Moderegger,
Franziska Lamprecht, Dan Seiple)
127 Illuminated Windows
March 2001
I want to call your attention to the artist groups (E-TEAM and GELATIN) who were selected to be part of the Lower Manhattan Cultural Council (LMCC) World Views / Studioscape (slow link) programs that allowed them and other artists to work and live in the WTC in the four years leading up to 9/11 on different floors, including 91 and 92 of the North Tower. Additionally, they were given seven day a week construction access to the WTC that allowed them to freely move all sorts of materials in and out of the complex. (Note: When you give young artists access to a building and work-live space, they’re going figure out everything they can and can’t get away with in there. I’ve lived in several wild artist buildings and from my experience, once they’re in, they can get anywhere they want...especially with climbing gear & harnesses...see photos below. LMCC and WTC management would know that before approving such a program. For artists to be able to take out windows on the 91st floor and install a makeshift “balcony” (see the NYTimes, August 2001) protruding out of the building should give you some real insight into just how lax WTC security was at that time and how dangerous the LMCC program was. Sounds to me like the WTC was conveniently out of control in the years leading up to 9/11 and that security there was a complete joke as far as these artists and all their friends were concerned...see photos below.)

As you may know, audacity, arrogance and a love of esotericism (“it’s a great piece of artwork...you just don’t get it”) are common features of the art world, especially among privileged and highly connected, younger artists. Therefore, I think it is plausible that the E-Team might also stand for Explosives Team (amongst themselves, their handlers and sponsors) and that Gelatin’s The B-Thing may also be, not so secretly, referring to explosives (see blasting gelatin & note that Gelatin became Gelitin in ’05...wonder why?). Keep in mind that we gave these foreign groups WTC construction access and allowed them to live directly in the strike zone through the LMCC World Views and Studioscape programs. They would probably look upon most of Americans as complete idiots and that their work was highly sanctioned by the people in charge. And as incredible as it might sound, I think it is very possible that the “team” (that included many others) may have advertised itself in a major way to their special audience under the cover of “art”, right on the WTC strike zone just before 9/11 (see 127 Illuminated Windows).

Read more


U-Tube: 9/11 Mossad Agents were in the twin towers

Clueless Liberals Confronted By the Reality of Self-Genocide by Mass Immigration

John Cleese [0:07] “I am not sure what is going on in Britain”… 

You’re losing your country, that’s what’s going on in Britain, you dolt.

Source: Deep Resource


Paul Weston: Immigration, Altruism and National Suicide

WUFS: Baltic states resist suicide by mass immigration: the racist bastards

Tuesday, September 15, 2015

Is It Right to Be Racist?

Is it right to be racist? The answer depends on what you mean by "Right" and what you mean by "Racist", which in turn depends on what you mean by "Race." Here, I'll sort out these terms first and then examine the logic and morality of "Racism."

Human diversity is the result of populuations having lived for dozens, hundreds or thousands of generations in more or less genetic isolation during which time they have diverged from other groups as the result of selection, random genetic drift, and mutation to create the fascinating variety of human form, physiognomy and physiology, the photographic representation of which, in the pages of the National Geographic, undoubtedly accounts for the enduring popularity of that publication.

Thus human populations having little or no gene exchange with other populations become differentiated from one another and thus constitute distinct races. The races of mankind cannot be defined by some single marker such as skin color. Rather, races differ in gene pool composition, the differences reflecting not only the presence or absence of particular genes, but also the frequency of occurrence of genes common to most or all other populations. The races of mankind thus differ from one another in many ways, often subtle, the significance of which is generally impossible to assess, although many such differences must serve, or have served, to promote the survival of the groups concerned under the particular circumstances of their past or present existence.

Thus, rather than being divided into clear-cut and discretely separated racial blocks, human populations are related to one another as the branches of a family tree, but with many cross connections as groups have split, or in some instances merged or at least shared genes, as the result of migrations and conquests.

Within groups of any size, interbreeding though potentially free, is impeded by barriers of class, caste, or geography. Thus within any large racial group, there exist sub-groups that may be further divided down to the level of tribe, clan and extended family.

Despite the fuzziness of racial distinctions, the populations of the different regions and nations of the Earth are mostly distinct from one another. In some cases, relatively homogeneous population may be spread among several nations. Conversely, political boundaries have often been established without consideration of race, with the result that many states incorporate members of more than one racial group. Moreover, the recently established settler nations, the US, Canada, and Australia among others, are highly racially heterogeneous, possessing citizens of almost every major racial category on Earth. In time, populations of mixed-race countries will tend to coalesce to form a new race. Although initially these mongrel races will have an unusually heterogeneous genetic composition, in time that heterogeneity will be whittled down through various selective processes.

We can say, therefore, yes, contrary to the PC propaganda, the racial differences that everyone is conscious of, the difference between a Chinese and a Frenchman, a Russian and a Zulu, an Australian aboriginal and a Canadian Innu are all real genetically based racial differences. Furthermore, less deeply differentiated sub-racial groups exist among those larger racial groups. The Scots, collectively, are undoubtedly different from the English, but they are closer to the English, the Welsh and the Irish than they are to say, the Germans, Bulgarians or Turks.

So what then is a "Racist." To a PC propagandist, it is racist even to assert the reality of race, which means that in large part, "Racist" is simply a stupid term of abuse. But to the PC propagandist, a racist is also a person who opposes the destruction of racial and cultural identities through mass movements of people and multi-culturalism. And since some of the largest mass migrations of the present day are from the Third World to the European nations, which currently are severely reproductive dysfunctional, such movements are essentially genocidal, since the highly fertile Third Worlders will on present trends become, within a generation or two, the majority and dominant group within the country to which they have moved, as has happened already in many of the great European urban centers, including London and Paris.

Thus, according to the PC propagandists, a racist is a person who opposes racial and cultural genocide. Let me say that again, to a PC propagandist, a racist is a person opposed to genocide of their own people.

So is it wrong to oppose the genocide of one's own people? To pose the question is surely to answer it. Fighting for the survival of one's own has to be a fundamental human right. But what then of those who seek to promote genocide against the European or any other peoples? They recognize the existence of racial and cultural diversity within the human species and seek to destroy it through the process of miscegenation, thus eliminating entire peoples and civilizations. The implication is clear, since the liberal left define racism as opposition to the destruction of one's own people, racism is must be morally right.

But racism, as defined by the PC advocates of genocide, is not of course to be confused with the old-fashioned understanding of the term, which refers to a belief in the superiority of one race over another. Since human races clearly differ, they could be ranked in one way or another. West Africans, for example, produce the fastest runners, whereas Sherpas, Innu, Australian aboriginals possess physiological or neurological adaptations to their particular environments. However, the notion of the general superiority of one race over another, though it may be widely believed, is meaningless, for you cannot devise a ranking of human groups on multiple diverse scales, of skin color, proportion of fast muscle, IQ, height, tolerance to heat, cold, low oxygen or whatever. Belief in the odious notion of general superiority of one race over another, is of course deliberately conflated by liberals and leftists to smear those who uphold there perfectly legitimate right to self-preservation.


CanSpeccy: In Praise of Diversity

The Coming Great Inflation and Asset Price Collapse

No one knows the future, yet people spend much of their time trying to predict it. In their everyday lives, the predictions that people make usually prove correct, which explains why it is profitable to have a brain. However, when the same mental machinery is put to work on problems more remote both from everyday experience and from the present time, reliability of prediction tends rapidly toward zero. This is true not only of predictions made by ordinary folk with only the most superficial knowledge of, say, climate change, economics, or politics, but of the professional prognosticators, whose credibility, such as it is, remains intact only because they dress up their predictions in all kinds of highfalutin verbiage or mathematical mumbo-jumbo.

But while it is pretty safe to say that all predictions about climate, the economy, or the organization of global power 100 years hence are almost certainly wrong except by mere chance, it may nevertheless be useful to examine propositions in the form: all other things being equal, if x,  then y or z, or a or b.

At least such statements acknowledge that a multiplicity of other factors have been ignored, and that they therefore assert nothing definite about the future. An advantage of this approach is that it makes for civilized debate: no need to call someone a denier or an alarmist if they acknowledge at the outset the extent of their ignorance about future climate. Moreover, it encourages one to look for variables that remain unmeasured, or not thought of, and to remember that there still remain blind chance, the unknowable, and the possibility of divine intervention.

It is on this very modest basis that I predict the Coming Great Inflation and Asset Price Collapse. My "if x," is this: if Donald Trump or another person elected the next President of the United States implements what I earlier called Trumponomics. I make the election of Donald Trump or another person as well as the implementation of Trumponomics conditional, as a reminder of the uncertainty of every aspect of the future and, in particular, as a reminder that before November 8, 2016 all life on earth may be extinguished by an unanticipated meteor impact, a supernova explosion in the vicinity of the Sun, all out nuclear war, or simply because  Barack Obama declares himself President-For-Life.

So, to reiterate, here is the program I called Trumponomics:

(A) Corporation Tax and Business Investment: An end to, or a radical cut in, the corporation tax, profits to be taxed as dividends in the hands of shareholders. This, combined with other measures, particularly item (C) below, will induce billions in new investment in America factories, research laboratories, and design studios, much of the new investment resulting from repatriation of profits of American-based international corporations.

(B) Income Tax: Radical cuts to income tax at the lower end of the income scale, with modest increases in taxation at the upper end of the income scale, thereby increasing consumer spending and thus demand for goods and services that generate employment in America.

(C) Jobs: An across-the-board tariff on all imports, including software, design and other services, oil and other resources, thus, in combination with (A), inducing a domestic investment frenzy in manufacturing, oil, mining, R and D, software development, and design.

(D)  Energy and Environment: (1) Promote energy conservation and carbon emissions reductions with a carbon tax plus a countervailing duty (in addition to the general import tax) on manufactured goods from countries without a carbon tax; (2) Open up both off- and on-shore areas for oil and gas extraction making the US a permanently low-energy-cost manufacturing location; (3) Invest billions in energy tech research: thorium reactors; zero emission coal power; etc.

(E) Education: Cut the PC crap and restore control to state and local authorities.

The outcome? Fed Funds rate at 5% plus, inflation at 5% plus, unemployment down from 16% (U6) to under 5%, US GDP growth rate 10%; US literacy sharply rising; US GDP to double by 2024.

The return of significant inflation and sharply higher interests rates will collapse bond values, house prices and shares of companies like Amazon and Tesla that have silly Price/Earnings ratios. Not all shares will be badly hit, however. WallMart, for example, will likely adapt easily from being the most efficient vendor of cheap Chinese stuff, to being the most efficient vendor of somewhat less cheap (because of higher labor costs) American stuff. MacDonalds, StarBucks and hundreds of other large American corporations and tens of thousands of small American corporations will boom because of the revival in American prosperity and hence American consumer spending. 

And an American economic renaissance will not happen in isolation. All Western nations, if they want to trade freely with the United States will have to bring their economic arrangements in line with those in the US. In particular, they will have to play by the same rules on importation of cheap Third-World labor and products from Asian sweat shops.

Sunday, September 13, 2015

Canadian Election: A Dull Droning Sound Across the Frozen North

It's hard to pay attention to a Canadian general election while, simultaneously, Europe submits to an Islamic invasion with the full backing of its ZioNazi, New-World-Ordure masters, Merkel, Cameroon, Tusk, etc.; the UK Labour Party exchanges one ugly but quite likable, left-wing Jewish leader, Ed Milliband, for an even uglier and much less likeable, ultra left-wing, Jewish leader, Jeremy Corbyn; Donald Trump makes a mockery of the astonishingly uncharismatic representatives of oil, Israel, big pharma, Lockheed Martin, the incarceration, gaming, porn and movie industries, Wall Street and the big banks, who are contending for the Republican Party Presidential nomination; and Hillary Clinton, the leading Democratic contender for the position of the most powerful man in the world, undergoes a slow-mo, Fukushima-style melt-down.

Still a Canadian election must mean something, so here's out assessment of the options. Stephen Harper, who calls any critic of Israel an anti-Semite, thereby making anti-Semite a term of honor, and who wants Canadian forces sent to fight and die in any war for American empire and Israel, is running for a third term as prime minister, after botching his first two.

Specifically, Harper botched his main task, to ensure the construction of pipelines to carry tar sands oil to coastal terminals by disregarding First Nations land title, now confirmed by the Supreme Court of Canada, and by gutting environmental legislation, thereby arousing near universal public opposition to all pipelines anywhere. In addition, Harper's Borg-like, control-freak personality is finally apparent to all and sundry and, as a result of the trial of former Conservative Party shill, Senator Mike Duffy, it is also now evident that not only Harper's aids, but almost certainly Harper himself, have lied relentlessly to cover up a petty scandal that might have disturbed one or two of the dimmer members of the Tory party voting "base." And then the Canadian economy, under Harper's astute leadership, fell into recession just as the election was called.

Realistically, therefore, the alternatives for Canadians, are the likable and fairly dim-witted Justin Trudeau, who seems to sensibly take advice from the real politicians in the Liberal Party back rooms, and the high IQ, Thomas Mulcair, a seedy-looking, bearded ex-liberal who recently sought employment as an aid to Stephen Harper, but who opted instead to lead the supposedly left-wing New Democratic Party of Canada.

By way of policy, Mulcair's big deal is to create a million fifteen-dollar-a-day daycare places for the children of working mothers, a program that would require a gigantic bureaucracy to administer effectively and would cost at least a billion a month indefinitely. The idea is to help poor working mothers. But what about poor unworking mothers who stay home and look after their own children instead of getting someone else to do it for them, while someone else again pays for it. Well screw them, obviously.

Trudeau's idea for pissing away public money is rather more benign, consisting in a plan for a three-year, ten-billion-dollar-a-year infrastructure program to kickstart the recession-bound Canadian economy. As someone described a similar Liberal Party scheme of an earlier time, it is like trying to start the engines of Boeing 747 with a couple of flashlight batteries. But the feebleness of the scheme is in fact part of its attraction: the cost, which has been fixed in advance is, in the scope of a two trillion dollar economy, quite limited. Ideally, the money would be allocated to the municipalities across the nation on a per capita basis. That way, at least a few pot holes would be filled. More likely though, the cash will be unevenly distributed according to political considerations and will mainly reach the pockets of Liberal-friendly contractors for the construction of unnecessary sports stadiums and the like. Still, it will require little bureaucracy to administer and it has a best-by date.

On policy, therefore, Trudeau looks the better bet.

But to be fair, we should mention the Green Party. Their big thing is a carbon tax, which is not a bad idea. At least it might end the tiresome debate on what to do about fossil fuels and climate change, since a carbon tax minimizes carbon emissions in the most economically efficient way.

Unfortunately, the Greens spoiled their plan by saying that they would distribute revenue raised by the carbon tax among the poor, which is inane. If you want to help the poor with taxpayer's money, OK, but do it out of general revenue on a scale that is judged appropriate, don't link it to some particular source of revenue which may or may not be of the appropriate amount.

A carbon tax should go into general revenue and be made revenue neutral by a commensurate reduction in other taxes, consistent with the principle of taxing what we don't want while reducing or eliminating taxes on what we do want: income, for example.

One Reasonable German Citizen's View of the God Forsaken, Impudent, Shitty, State Serving, Media Lying About the Syrian Refugee Crisis

Thursday, September 10, 2015

Trump Avows Faith in the Holy Ghost, Oswald the Lone Assassin, and Jet Fuel Fires Collapsed the WTC Towers

The Legitimacy of most institutions and all states is based on lies or myths. Thus if an aspirant to the Papacy asserts belief in God we know he is merely affirming loyalty to the institution, whereas if he denies the existence of God, we know he really means it.

Likewise, in America, aspirants to the Presidency must  affirm belief in God, Lee Harvey Oswald as the lone assassin of JFK, and jet fuel fires as the cause of the collapse of the Twin Towers. Those who say otherwise are not serious contenders for power.

Donald Trump, this week, made his pledge of allegiance to all three pillars of American state legitimacy.

Responding to rival Republican presidential contender Ben Carson, who questioned Trump's Faith, Trump asserted "I am a man of faith" and "I'm a believer, big league, in God and the Bible."

So, OK, Trump's made the pledge on the virgin birth, the Holy Ghost and the Risen Christ.

Now onto the Kennedy assassination. In an interview with Bloomberg hosts Mark Halperin and John Heilemann, Trump was asked:
Do you believe that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone. 
To which he responded:
I believe he acted alone, yes.
Never mind that Oswald denied having anything to do with the killing. Never mind that Oswald was never charged with, let alone tried for, the killing. Never mind that Oswald was murdered while in police custody. Never mind that Lyndon Baines Johnson and the CIA had much better reason than Lee Harvey Oswald for wanting Kennedy dead. Never mind that Earl Warren, US Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, who presided over the inquiry into the Kennedy assassination, stated that:
We may not know the whole story in our lifetime.
And finally, the WTC Towers. Asked by a 9/11 Truther:
As a builder of many skyscrapers, you know they're built to be strong. Many people have questions about how those towers came down.
Trump responded with a question to reporters in the room, "Is this guy some kind of conspiracy guy?"

But it is only natural that Trump defends the official conspiracy theory about 9/11 — you know, the one about 19 hijackers with box cutters who did aerobatics with airliners though they weren't fit to fly a Cessna two-seater — because Trump was among the first to outline the official story. On 9/11, 2001, Trump was at ground zero where he gave an interview to a German TV reporter during which he spelled out what became the official explanation for the fall of the Twin Towers (and Building 7, which was not hit by an airliner):
...the tremendous amounts of fuel that was dumped on the building and... sixteen hundred degrees temperature. I guess that's more than than anything could take...
Which is exactly what the NIST report concluded four years later.

And the bit about 1600 degrees was a very effective piece of misdirection, deliberate or otherwise, since to a German audience 1600 degrees would mean 1600 degrees Celcius, just above the melting point of steel, which is 1492 degrees Celcius.

But jet fuel fires burn only as hot as 1600 degrees Farenheit, Farenheit being the American scale of temperature measurement. Thus, Trump's 1600 degrees equates to less than 800 degrees Celcius, well below the melting point of steel.

So on all the essential articles of faith that make a loyal servant of the American Empire, Trump is absolutely sound. And he objects to the Iran nuclear deal, because it jeopardizes, not America, but Israel. Yeah, this guy is absolutely sound. In fact he is the ultimate establishment anti-establishment candidate.


James Corbett: 9/11: A Conspiracy Theory

Canspeccy: State Crimes Against Democracy

CanSpeccy: JFK Assassination: The 50th Anniversary

Monday, September 7, 2015

The Obama Project: The Destruction of the West

We have long maintained that the object of Anglo-US policy is the destruction of the nation state and a transition to "global governance" by the UN, NATO, the WTO, and other remote bureaucracies subject to plutocratic control through after-office payoffs to officials, plus to be going on with, cash in brown envelopes, girls on demand,  and blackmail, the primary targets being the most powerful states, namely, the US, the European States, Russia, and China. We now have endorsement of the idea, not only from the loony conspiracy theorists of the blogsphere, but leading American political figures.

Dr. Ben Carson, who is running second to Donald Trump in the race for the Republican Party`s Presidential nomination, recently commented:
Let's say somebody were in the White House and they wanted to destroy this nation, [they] would create division among the people, encourage a culture of ridicule for basic morality and the principles that made and sustained the country, undermine the financial stability of the nation, and weaken and destroy the military. It appears ... that they are the very things that are happening right now.
And from the other side of the political spectrum, we have it from former US President Jimmy Carter that: "America no longer has a functioning democracy." Speaking of the 2010 Citizens United decision and the 2014 McCutcheon decision, both decisions by the five Republican judges on the U.S. Supreme Court, Carter said: 
These two historic decisions enable unlimited secret money (including foreign money) now to pour into U.S. political and judicial campaigns. 
In other words, the America government is subordinate to the global Money Power. 

But it's not just America that's targeted for destruction. Europe is now besieged by "refugees" from Iraq and Syria created by America's project to redraw the map of the Middle-East.

This, says  James Howard Kunstler:
is a preview of a horror show to which there is no end in sight, and is certain to escalate. ... Wave beyond wave awaits after the this one. And then what will the well-intentioned sentimentalists say? We wanted to do the right thing… we meant well… we cried when we saw the little boy dead on the beach….
The little boy dead on the beach who may have been part of a psyop:

Nobody is helping the boy, not even the fishermen
or the smirking photographer. Source: Aangirfan
The idea, continues Kunstler:
that the nations currently bethinking themselves “rich” can take in, shelter, and employ the masses fleeing MENA (and elsewhere) is absurd. Somehow the people in charge, plus the intellectual classes who shape opinion and consensus, are going to have to arrive at some clear notion of limits and boundaries.
But that is not the idea at all. The idea behind the destruction of the Western nations is genocide. The people of Europe and the European immigrants who built the United States of America are to be genocided racially and culturally by mass immigration, multiculturalism and the suppression of the fertility of the native-born population, these measured being imposed with the aid of intensive propaganda delivered in the guise of education, plus legally enforced political correctness, and the impoverishment of the working and middle-classes.

The result aimed for is the destruction of the Western nations to produce a mongrel population without pride or sense of identity over whom an unseen and unknown global plutocratic elite will rule by way of corrupt global institutions. The project has long been in the making.

Unz Review: Refugee Flows: a Grand Strategic Weapon of Mass Destruction

Realist Report: Jewish Republicans “Disturbed” By Trump’s Widespread Popularity

The Tap Blog: The Carefully Calculated Mass Migration Agenda
Breitbart: What’s the truth behind the story of the drowned boy Aylan Kurdi?

Aanirfan: Kurdi Photographs