Monday, November 7, 2011

Obama on Netanyahu: I deal with him every day

Microphones accidently left on after G20 meeting pick up private conversation between US, French presidents. Sarkozy admits he 'can't stand' Israeli premier. Obama: You're fed up with him? I have to deal with him every day! YNet News.com
Which makes it clear, for any who may have doubted it, where Obama gets his orders.

The report continues:
The surprising lack of coverage may be explained by a report alleging that reporters present at the event were requested to sign an agreement to keep mum on the subject of the embarrassing comments.

A member of the media confirmed Monday that "there were discussions between journalists and they agreed not to publish the comments due to the sensitivity of the issue.
Which makes it clear, for any who may have doubted it, that keeping you informed is not a mainstream media priority -- unless you're an Israeli, apparently.

Sunday, November 6, 2011

Mohammed Din


Who is the happy man? He that sees in his own house at home, little children crowned with dust, leaping and falling and crying. --Munichandra, translated by Professor Peterson.
The polo-ball was an old one, scarred, chipped, and dinted. It stood on the mantelpiece among the pipe-stems which Imam Din, khitmatgar, was cleaning for me.

"Does the Heaven-born want this ball?" said Imam Din, deferentially.

The Heaven-born set no particular store by it; but of what use was a polo-ball to a khitmatgar?

"By your Honor's favor, I have a little son. He has seen this ball, and desires it to play with. I do not want it for myself."

No one would for an instant accuse portly old Imam Din of wanting to play with polo-balls. He carried out the battered thing into the veranda; and there followed a hurricane of joyful squeaks, a patter of small feet, and the thud-thud-thud of the ball rolling along the ground. Evidently the little son had been waiting outside the door to secure his treasure. But how had he managed to see that polo-ball?

Next day, coming back from office half an hour earlier than usual, I was aware of a small figure in the dining-room--a tiny, plump figure in a ridiculously inadequate shirt which came, perhaps, half-way down the tubby stomach. It wandered round the room, thumb in mouth, crooning to itself as it took stock of the pictures. Undoubtedly this was the "little son."

He had no business in my room, of course; but was so deeply absorbed in his discoveries that he never noticed me in the doorway. I stepped into the room and startled him nearly into a fit. He sat down on the ground with a gasp. His eyes opened, and his mouth followed suit. I knew what was coming, and fled, followed by a long, dry howl which reached the servants' quarters far more quickly than any command of mine had ever done. In ten seconds Imam Din was in the dining-room. Then despairing sobs arose, and I returned to find Imam Din admonishing the small sinner who was using most of his shirt as a handkerchief.

"This boy," said Imam Din, judicially, "is a budmash--a big budmash. He will, without doubt, go to the jail-khana for his behavior." Renewed yells from the penitent, and an elaborate apology to myself from Imam Din.

"Tell the baby," said I, "that the Sahib is not angry, and take him away." Imam Din conveyed my forgiveness to the offender, who had now gathered all his shirt round his neck, stringwise, and the yell subsided into a sob. The two set off for the door. "His name," said Imam Din, as though the name were part of the crime, "is Muhammad Din, and he is a budmash." Freed from present danger, Muhammad Din turned round in his father's arms, and said gravely, "It is true that my name is Muhammad Din, Tahib, but I am not a budmash. I am a man!"

From that day dated my acquaintance with Muhammad Din. Never again did he come into my dining-room, but on the neutral ground of the garden, we greeted each other with much state, though our conversation was confined to "Talaam, Tahib" from his side, and "Salaam, Muhammad Din" from mine. Daily on my return from office, the little white shirt, and the fat little body used to rise from the shade of the creeper-covered trellis where they had been hid; and daily I checked my horse here, that my salutation might not be slurred over or given unseemly.

Muhammad Din never had any companions. He used to trot about the compound, in and out of the castor-oil bushes, on mysterious errands of his own. One day I stumbled upon some of his handiwork far down the grounds. He had half buried the polo-ball in dust, and stuck six shriveled old marigold flowers in a circle round it.

Outside that circle again was a rude square, traced out in bits of red brick alternating with fragments of broken china; the whole bounded by a little bank of dust. The water-man from the well-curb put in a plea for the small architect, saying that it was only the play of a baby and did not much disfigure my garden.

Heaven knows that I had no intention of touching the child's work then or later; but, that evening, a stroll through the garden brought me unawares full on it; so that I trampled, before I knew, marigold-heads, dust-bank, and fragments of broken soap-dish into confusion past all hope of mending. Next morning, I came upon Muhammad Din crying softly to himself over the ruin I had wrought. Some one had cruelly told him that the Sahib was very angry with him for spoiling the garden, and had scattered his rubbish, using bad language the while. Muhammad Din labored for an hour at effacing every trace of the dust-bank and pottery fragments, and it was with a tearful and apologetic face that he said "Talaam, Tahib," when I came home from office. A hasty inquiry resulted in Imam Din informing Muhammad Din that, by my singular favor, he was permitted to disport himself as he pleased. Whereat the child took heart and fell to tracing the ground-plan of an edifice which was to eclipse the marigold-polo-ball creation.

For some months, the chubby little eccentricity revolved in his humble orbit among the castor-oil bushes and in the dust; always fashioning magnificent palaces from stale flowers thrown away by the bearer, smooth water-worn pebbles, bits of broken glass, and feathers pulled, I fancy, from my fowls--always alone, and always crooning to himself.

A gaily-spotted sea-shell was dropped one day close to the last of his little buildings; and I looked that Muhammad Din should build something more than ordinarily splendid on the strength of it. Nor was I disappointed. He meditated for the better part of an hour, and his crooning rose to a jubilant song. Then he began tracing in the dust. It would certainly be a wondrous palace, this one, for it was two yards long and a yard broad in ground-plan. But the palace was never completed.

Next day there was no Muhammad Din at the head of the carriage-drive, and no "Talaam, Tahib" to welcome my return. I had grown accustomed to the greeting, and its omission troubled me. Next day Imam Din told me that the child was suffering slightly from fever and needed quinine. He got the medicine, and an English Doctor.

"They have no stamina, these brats," said the Doctor, as he left Imam Din's quarters.

A week later, though I would have given much to have avoided it, I met on the road to the Mussulman burying-ground Imam Din, accompanied by one other friend, carrying in his arms, wrapped in a white cloth, all that was left of little Muhammad Din.

The story of Mohammed Din was written by Rudyard Kipling at the age of 20. It was first published in the Civil and Military Gazette on 8 September, 1886, reprinted in the United Services College Chronicle on 18 December the same year, and collected in Plain Tales from the Hills in 1888, and in successive later editions of that collection.

Some critical comments on this story are gathered here.

Rudyard Kipling, declined most of the honors offered him, including a knighthood, the Poet Laureateship, and the Order of Merit, but in 1907 he accepted the Nobel Prize for Literature.

Saturday, November 5, 2011

Odious debt

In international law, odious debt is a legal theory that holds that the national debt incurred by a regime for purposes that do not serve the best interests of the nation, should not be enforceable.
To the bankers, sovereign debt has always had a special appeal. It is backed by the taxing power of the state and so need never default.

Until now.

As US/NATO seeks to transform the world in the name of democracy, the people are resisting the demand that they bear the burden of debt contracted without their consent.

In Egypt, Eric Walberg reports, revolutionaries are calling for cancellation of their countries foreign debts.
... the campaign, which does not call for wholesale cancellation of the debt, but for a line-by-line review of the loan terms and useage to determine: whether the loan was made with the consent of the people of Egypt, whether it serves the interests of the people, and to what extent it was wasted through corruption. ... foreign lending institutions knew full well that Mubarak was a dictator conducting phoney elections and thus not reflecting the will of the people when they showered him with money, and they should face the consequences -- not the Egyptian people.
The same logic must be applicable in many countries.

This is taking democracy a step too far. Democracy is more of a feel-good thing. Obviously, no one in charge wants the 99% buggering up their racket.

Friday, November 4, 2011

November 6, 2011: Some links

Bloomberg BusinessWeek: Will Shale Gas Reignite the U.S. Economy?

GRC: Economic Dictatorship. The European Stability Mechanism (ESM)
This is astounding, even for the fascist EU.
JewAmongYou: Our "golden years:" how the immigrants will take care of us

Patrick Buchanan: 'Arrivederci, Roma': Will Popular Democracy Bring Down The New World Order?

Fred Reed: A Culture in Regression

Bill Bonner: The easiest way to get money is to steal it: which is why everyone turns to the government for help

GRTV: The science of 9/11

James Corbett Interview: Professor Michael Hudson discusses the transformation of Western government from democracy to thieving financial oligarchy

Trusting in the wisdom and maturity of the Greek people. LOL

Monday October 31: European markets again plunged this week after a surprise announcement on Monday by Greek Prime Minister George Papandreou that he would hold a referendum on the latest EU debt deal.

Papandreou defended putting the bailout to the Greek people, saying:
I trust the wisdom and the maturity of the Greek people and I trust them ... I'm not saying this romantically, I deeply believe in democracy.
Thursday, November 3: Greek Prime Minister George Papandreou agreed to shelve the controversial plan for a referendum on Athens's latest financial bailout claiming the call for a referendum was a brilliant tactical move, which caused opposition leader Antonis Samaras to reverse course and support the rescue package.

So much for trusting "the wisdom and maturity of the Greek people." For a moment we thought Papandreou must be some kind of nutbar democrat.

This, obviously, is the time for the Greeks population to riot.

The debt the Greeks cannot pay was entered into by a corrupt government that concealed the magnitude of the financial catastrophe it had created by dishonest accounting. Now taht the scam has been exposed, both the new government and the old governing party expect the Greek people to pay.

But since the debt was contracted without public approval, why should it be regarded as a public debt?

This is a question that should have been considered not only by the Greek government, but also by the European banks that made the loans and the US banks that insured the loans through the sale of derivatives.

In this discussion with James Corbett, Professor Michael Hudson explains explains why the people, whether in Iceland or in Greece, have no moral obligation to pay "odious debts" incurred by their governments without their consent or knowledge.

See also:
Chris Floyd: Greece is the canary in the coal mine of modern hyper-capitalism
YaYa Canada: Yo! The Greek referendum was all crapola
CanSpeccy: The Greek referendum: what's it about?
CanSpeccy: Time for the abolition of Greece?

Thursday, November 3, 2011

The British National Party: A Conspiracy Against Democracy?

According to Lee John Barnes, former legal adviser to the British National Party
British Nationalism is a total disgrace.

Led by idiots and crooks and filled with lick spittles that think unconditional loyalty to their bent Fuhrer [equals] patriotism. ...

These are supposed to be 'leaders' of the Nationalist movement, a bunch of greedy, idiotic, corrupt egotists and loons who have used the movement for their own ends. ...

Let the whole movement burn to the ground.

Only then will something better rise from the ashes.
That may be a fair assessment: the BNP, a party led by idiots and crooks signifying nothing.

Or it could be that the "idiots and crooks" and "corrupt egoists" running the movement have, with cool intent, skillfully intimidated through fear of association, those who would otherwise support the populist policies comprising the BNP's avowed platform.

Consider the party's supposed agenda, which is to:

end mass immigration to what is one of the World's most densely populated countries; require illegal immigrants to leave Britain; institute a national industrial policy that protects British jobs and preserves Britain's industrial workforce skills and technological capabilities; pull out of Afghanistan immediately; exit the EU; grant teachers the authority to restore discipline in the classroom; focus education on basic literacy and numeracy skills, and the study of British history and culture; remove legal curbs on the freedom of speech; implement a Bill of Rights; introduce citizen-initiated referenda; devolve powers of the central government to the lowest feasible level (See all this under the policy tab on the BNP Website).

And how has the BNP leader, Cambridge-trained lawyer, Nick Griffin, promoted these policies?

By surrounding himself with a band of nuckle-draggers and crypto fascists.

By repelling decent people by racists remarks, widely publicized and then implausibly denied.

By bloodying the nose of a Times reporter during the general election campaign and then boasting that this proved that the party had not gone soft.

By having the party's publicity chief arrested for making death threats against the party leader.

By bizarrely turning the BNP into a laughing stock by conducting a national televised broadcast with the image of a Marmite jar as a backdrop: an apparently meaningless stunt that drew the threat of legal action by Unilever, owner of the Marmite trademark.

Then there's Griffin's association with Roberto Fiore, a self-proclaimed fascist who fled Italy in the wake of the (?Gladio) 1980 Bologna train station bombing that killed 85 people. Fiore was convicted in absentia of conspiring to carry out an armed attack.

Gladio was created by NATO at the end of WWII to discredit populist left wing parties in Europe.

Griffin's BNP looks and acts like a mechanism to discredit any populist, anti-imperialist movement in Britain.

The existence of the British National Party, I suggest, mocks the notion of democracy in Britain and ensures that control of the British Government remains firmly in the hands of the lackeys of the corporate oligarchs, the Anglo-US empire and the Con/Lib/Lab Friends of Israel.

Wednesday, November 2, 2011

The silliness of those who give Julian Assange unquestioning support

Defrocked UK Ambassador Craig Murray is a staunch supporter of Julian Assange, who he presents as a victim of US Government persecution.

Oddly, neither Murray nor his supporters seem to think it reasonable to question the assumption that Assange is some kind of rebel, saint or Knight errant, fighting the system.

Thus, in response to Murray's latest blog about Assange, someone writes:
We must prepare to take on the system if it does not find in favour of Assange.
Really?

Assange strikes some people as a "narcissistic sociopath."

Assange, like Craig Murray, received the Sam Adams Award for "integrity in intelligence", from a group of retired CIA officials.

No one seems interested in discussing what intelligence work Assange is, or was, engaged in or with which intelligence service he was employed.

Assange has the unlimited financial backing of the very rich Jemima Khan (née Goldsmith) in his legal difficulties in England.

He is presently accommodated in England by well to do supporters.

In dealing with Sweden's demand for his extradition, Assange has the services of a Rothschild-connected lawyer.

Assange the whistle-blower, worked in close collaboration with the mainstream media, including the New York Times, which in turn worked with the White House, in releasing secret US diplomatic cables.

There is no way of checking the authenticity of the secret cables made public by Assange, but as Zbigniev Brzezinski pointed out, they may very well have been fed to Assange by one of the intelligence agencies:
ZBIGNIEW BRZEZINSKI: But I think the most serious issues are not those which are getting the headlines right now. Who cares if Berlusconi is described as a clown. Most Italians agree with that. Who cares if Putin is described as an alpha dog? He probably is flattered by it.

The real issue is, who is feeding Wikipedia on this issue — Wiki — Wiki — WikiLeaks on this issue? They’re getting a lot of information which seems trivial, inconsequential, but some of it seems surprisingly pointed. …The very pointed references to Arab leaders could have as their objective undermining their political credibility at home, because this kind of public identification of their hostility towards Iran could actually play against them at home.

The silliness of the charges made against Assange in Sweden, could as well have been concocted for the purpose of gaining sympathy for Assange and painting him as a victimized opponent of "the system," than for the purpose of placing him in the hands of the US Government.

Tuesday, November 1, 2011

The Greek referendum: what's it about?

Cartoon: Steve Bell, the Guardian

The Story So Far
A corrupt Greek government borrowed billions the country could never repay in order to buy votes of hundreds of thousands of public servants who get 14 months pay per year while working only seven months a year and quitting work at 2.30 in the afternoon on days when they are nominally working -- that is until they begin collecting their pensions at 55. The scale of overpayment is illustrated by Greece's state-owned railway which pays four times as much in wages as it collects in fares.

The government concealed the magnitude of the budget deficit, which far exceeded the 3% of GDP to which Greece committed when adopting the Euro, by the simple expedient of never adding up its expenditures.

The new government of George Papandreou, wishing to avoid blame for the inevitable deluge, ordered that an accounting be made. When, as a result, it was announced that Greece was running a deficit equal to 12% of GDP, holders of Greek debt panicked. For the better avoidance of uncertainty, the IMF was called in and determined that the deficit was not 12% of GDP but 14%.

Even more excitement. The Government made spending cuts, which prompted many Greeks to go on the rampage. They blockaded the ports thereby preventing cruise ship passengers with money to spend from landing. They burnt banks, in the process burning alive several bank employees including a pregnant woman, notwithstanding that Greece's very conservative banks had nothing to do with the crisis.

Holders of Greek debt, including mainly rather stupid French, Belgian and German banks, agreed to a 50% "haircut" on Greek debt: the chance of recovering half their money being reluctantly accepted as preferable to the certainty of a 100% loss. Meantime, Greek demonstrators burnt German flags inscribed with the swastika, believing, evidently, that Germans are evil people who should pay Greek pensions even when Greeks retire as early as 50 in the case of occupations designated "stressful" (e.g., hairdressing), which is five years earlier than Germans themselves retire.

Now the Greek Government will ask Greeks if they agree to pay even that much. Hence Steve Bell's cartoon, which makes clear what the referendum result will almost certainly be. The inevitability of a "no" in the referendum means the certainty of a Greek default and Greece's exit from the Euro.

This will leave a large hole in the capital of a number of major European banks. Much if not all of the loss will have been insured by means of derivatives. When payment under these credit default swaps comes due, it will be interesting to see whether the counter parties are able to pay. Almost certainly, there will have to be government bailouts of one party or the other.Which makes one wonder: why don't the French and Germans pay off Greece's debts now and kick the Greeks out of the Euro at once, thus bringing the crisis promptly to  its inevitable conclusion.

Iceland is tiny. Their bonkers banking scandal shocked the financial world. Ireland is tiny, their incompetent greedy bankers left the Irish people shackled with debt for years to come. Greece is small, yet its impending government default is shaking the banking system across Europe and beyond. After that there's Portugal, Spain and Italy still to blow.

What are the odds that the Euro will remain a going concern by the end of 2012? For that matter, what are the odds that the EU will remain a going concern by the end of 2012?

Aangirfan provides an interesting historical perspective on the current financial wrangle. The Germans, so some have calculated, owe the Greeks sixty billion in war reparations. Mugging the German banks is most likely the only chance the Greeks have of getting their money.

But are Germans responsible for the crimes of their ancestors? If so, why not the British, the Americans, the Israelis, the ancient Greeks and Romans, the Medes and Persians? Where does this end?

And here's what the Greeks are being asked to vote on (Source):
  • Income tax threshold would be lowered from €12,000 (£10,300) to €5,000 (£4,300
  • Retirement age would be raised to 65
  • VAT would rise from 19 to 23 per cent
  • Higher property taxes
  • Monthly pensions above €1,000 (£860) would be cut by 20 per cent
  • Excise on fuel, cigarettes and alcohol would rise by a third
  • To qualify for a full pension people would be required to complete 40 years work
  • Retirees aged under 55 would lose 40 per cent of their pensions over €1,000 (£860)
  • Public sector wages would be cut by 20 per cent
  • Employees of state-owned enterprises would have their wages cut by 30 per cent
  • A cap would be introduced on wages and bonuses
  • 30,000 civil servants would be suspended on partial pay
  • All temporary contracts for public sector workers would be terminated
  • Just one in 10 civil servants retiring this year would be replaced
  • New levies on household incomes of between one and five per cent.

So, anyone expecting Greeks to vote for that needs their head examining. Which means the referendum is merely the Greek government's way of telling their creditors to take their bonds and ....

See Also:
Trusting in the wisdom and maturity of the Greek people. LOL CanSpeccy
Time for the Abolition of Greece? CanSpeccy
EFSF Bond Sale Postponed Because of Market Conditions Mish
In Praise of Papandreou's Referendum Decision; Eurocrats Terrified of Democracy; Parade of Cowards Mish
Dutch Government Calls Timeout on Euro Bailout Deal Mish
EU Deal Unravels from Many Sides; Italy, France Bond Spreads Hit Record High vs. Germany; Bund Yield Drops Most on Record; All Out Bond Crisis Mish
Greek Army Threatens Military Coup Sparking Fears of Military Uprisings And Civil Wars Breaking Out Across All Of Europe Alexander Higgins Blog

Friday, October 28, 2011

Frank Lloyd Wright on War and Religion



On government as top-down gangsterism



On the tyranny of the media

Thursday, October 27, 2011

Time for the Abolition of Greece?

The Greeks have had their moments, but mainly thousands of years ago. Now the Parthenon is a dilapidated wreck with the roof gone, the columns bullet-pocked, and few of the statues possessed of a single intact limb. Even worse is the condition of the people who are apparently so deluded by the political class as to see no connection between money and work and who are now on a rampage burning German flags decorated with swastikas in support of their demand that German taxpayers pay Greek pensions which are unfunded because Greeks refuse to pay taxes.

Under the circumstances, abolition seems the only feasible solution. As a practical matter, the country could be sold off in chunks to hedge funds and other private investors, who would gain the right to collect taxes by whatever means might prove effective, flog off all publicly owned waterfront land for development, and rebuild the Parthenon as an iMax theatre showing reenactments of the Peloponnesian war, the death of Socrates and other exciting events in Greek history.

Come to think of it, the time seems ripe to privatize a good many other countries. Goldman Sachs, for example, could surely achieve better financial results in Ireland than the Irish. And once they'd got the finances turned around, they could do an IPO, which would allow the Irish to buy the place back, some of it anyhow, while leaving control in the hands of competent business people impervious to demands for retirement at 50, free education from K to early middle age, and limitless free healthcare.

In fact, what is truly extraordinary is the widespread belief that a bunch of professional politicians such as David Cameron, Nicolas Sarkozy and Barak Obama, none of whom are known to have done a useful day's work in their lives, are not only capable of managing a government that spends half the wealth of the nation, but that they would do so lovingly, in the interests of the people, rather than solely for personal advantage.

For the latest on the Greek bailout:
The Greek Referendum
Greek Debt Crisis Tipping Point, CFR
Bankfurt mole: this new ‘deal’ is a page one scam, The Slog
CDS on Greece a Purposeful Sham, Mish

Wednesday, October 26, 2011

No Apologies Here

Source

It seems common among bloggers to apologize for any interruption in the regular supply of fresh bloggage, to coin a term.

Well you'll receive no such apologies here. For one thing, for me to assume that the World needs to know my opinion on the non-stop succession of wars, frauds, indecencies and absurdities that make up our daily diet of news would be a clear sign of insanity -- a thought which raises the interesting question of whether most bloggers are, indeed, seriously unhinged.

And second of all, as some folks like to say, no one's paying to read this priceless verbiage, so what obligation can there be to produce it? None obviously, which means that apologies for light blogging merely reflect a fear of losing bloggees, to coin another term, that is to say fear of the injury to pride as page hits sputter to a mere trickle of those who got here only by the merest accident.

Source

Also, having been condemned for doing so, I vigorously assert a complete lack of shame, guilt or inclination to apologise for providing links to certain other Web sites whatever views may be expressed there, and I do so with the full backing of the Supreme Court of Canada which has ruled that:
Making reference to the existence and/or location of content by hyperlink or otherwise, without more, is not publication of that content.
And in fact, if one were to take a look at the lower right-hand side of this page, they would find links to a bizarrely diverse collection of sites, some though not all, places where opinions expressed strike me as more or less totally nuts. And, in general, the nuttier a site, the more I like it, which reminds me to add a link to the site of former UK Ambassador, former Liberal-Democrat and presently Scotch Nationalist, Craig Murray, where my comments are not infrequently moderated out.

So that's it for now, and I'll be back when I feel like it, no sooner.

Thursday, October 20, 2011

Obama, Natural Resources and the Conquest of Africa

The function of Obama is now clear: the conquest of Africa.
On 14 October, writes John Pilger, President Barack Obama announced he was sending United States special forces troops to Uganda to join the civil war there. In the next few months, US combat troops will be sent to South Sudan, Congo and Central African Republic. They will only “engage” for “self-defence”, says Obama, satirically. With Libya secured, an American invasion of the African continent is under way.


The tragedy of The War Against Terror, is that the energy monopoly sought by the US will not be worth the candle. With the quadrupling in oil price since 2000, new investments in exploration and advances in technology have revealed huge supplies of hydrocarbons in virtually every part of the world. They’re fracking for gas in Cheshire, England, there’s a glut of natural gas in North America, and China’s looking to develop its own shale resource.

But the biggest technological advances will be in energy efficiency. It takes one and a half to two kwh of electricity to make a litre of petrol. But it requires less than one and a half to two kwh of electricity to drive a light electric car as far as a Chevy travels on a litre of gas. And the Chinese have already built several hundred million electric bikes that can go just about all the way round the world on a kwh, and they are investing hugely in electric cars.

Then there’s solar power which will be competitive with oil sooner than later.

So when the war’s over, trillions will have been wasted, millions or perhaps billions of lives will have been disrupted or destroyed, free society will have ceased to exist even as an idea, and the fascist West will control a lot of useless oil fields and unnecessary pipelines.

The same will be true of virtually every other resource: rising prices will lead to improved techniques of discovery, higher use efficiency, and more cost efficient and complete recycling.

The recycling industry will be revolutionized by bar coding or chipping everything sold. Robots will identify the manufacturer, the ownership, the composition, and the recycling destination of every piece of trash. No more blue boxes and different colored wheely bins. If it's a manufactured item, just chuck it down the chute and a high-tech recycling industry will handle it. Maybe they'll even pay you if your rubbish contains enough reusable polyethylene, fermentable carbohydrate or neodymium.

See also
Beneath the UK lie trillions of cubic feet of shale gas, Daily Mail

Wednesday, October 19, 2011

Time for a new Balfour Declaration designating a homeland for the British?

The Express, Monday August 9, 2010: ONLY one baby in 10 born in some parts of the country has a mother of white British origin, figures revealed yesterday.

Britain’s rapidly changing ethnic make-up means white British women are now in a minority on maternity wards in 27 NHS hospital trust areas.

Across the country as a whole, they still account for 69 per cent of pregnant women receiving hospital care. But the figures from 150 NHS trusts in England reveal the ethnic diversity in metropolitan areas.

In north-west London, only one mother in 10 was of white British origin in 2008-9. At Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Trust in south London, mothers of white British origin made up just a quarter of those treated.

At Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals Trust, the proportion of white British mothers was 16.5 per cent, while at Bradford Teaching Hospitals Trust, it was 34 per cent.

Parts of the Home Counties also reflect shifting populations and migration. According to the figures, only 57 per cent of mothers giving birth in the West Hertfordshire Hospitals NHS Trust were categorised as white British in 2008-9. Among the remaining 43 per cent, the biggest groupings were “other white” (mainly eastern Europeans) Indians, Pakistanis, Africans and “other Asians”.

Read more

Or if grabbing a whole new homeland for a homeless nation at the expense of the Arabs or some other unfortunate people is no longer a viable option, would it not be possible to set aside a few reserves: Buckinghamshire, perhaps, or the less populated areas of North Devon?

But even such modest propsals as these will no doubt be howled down by the settlers and self-hating white enforcers of political correctness, which is to say the entire brainwashed lib-left British establishment, which does not exclude the Prime Minister and leader of the Conservative Party, David, Humanitarian-Bomber, Cameron.

Libya: What do you do when the people you prevented Gaddafi from killing start killing the black minorities that Gaddafi protected?

Every house, shop, school and public building in Tawergha has been ransacked since the Misrata rebels chased out pro-Gadhafi soldiers. At the time, hundreds of families also fled, fearing reprisals. Rebels slaughtered some of the livestock left behind, the carcasses of which are still rotting in the yards of abandoned homes.(Source: WSJ)
Another WSJ report makes it clear, it is not merely livestock in Tawergha that has been targeted for slaughter:
Ibrahim al-Halbous, a rebel commander leading the fight near Tawergha, says all remaining residents should leave once if his fighters capture the town. "They should pack up," Mr. Halbous said. "Tawergha no longer exists, only Misrata."

... Other rebel leaders are also calling for drastic measures like banning Tawergha natives from ever working, living or sending their children to schools in Misrata.

...Some of the hatred of Tawergha has racist overtones that were mostly latent before the current conflict. On the road between Misrata and Tawergha, rebel slogans like "the brigade for purging slaves, black skin" have supplanted pro-Gadhafi scrawl.
Meantime, as shown in this video, NATO is using anti-personnel cluster bombs on civilian targets in Libya:



As for the "responsibility to protect," see this and weep.

Sunday, October 16, 2011

Co-opting Occupy Wall St.

Is the Occupy Wall St. movement being co-opted, asks Prof. Michel Chossudovsky?

the report that Trikileaks founder, Julian Assange, addressed the London protest from the steps of St Pauls cathedral, should help focus attention on this question.

Assange, remember, is an admirer of the Australian pornographer, Poop Murdoch.

Assange earned the admiration of certain former CIA operatives who named him winner of the Sam Adams Award for "integrity in intelligence."

Assange claims to be a whistleblower, but he finds those who question the official US Government narrative on 9/11 "annoying."

With Assange and the American Nazi Party bidding for leadership roles in the movement, folks sure need to be wary about where Occupy Wall St. and its various spin-offs are heading.

And now President Obama and the Chinese Communist Party have added their voices to those who support OWS!

Speaking at the dedication of a new Memorial to Dr. Martin Luther King on Washington's National Mall, the President said:
Dr King would want us to challenge the excesses of Wall Street without demonising those who work there.
WTF!

"Would want us to challenge?"

Is this guy some sort of lone, powerless protestor, whose best effort is to wave a hand-made placard or make a speech?
Oh, and do make sure not to demonize the bastards who destroyed your country, loaded you with impossible debt, turned you out of your home and who have long since prepared safe havens where they can enjoy their ill-gotten billions safe from disturbance by the angry cries of the dispossessed losers such as Occupy Wall St. protesters.
Or is this dude supposed to be in charge of something. You know, able to do something, propose laws, bring to bear all the powers of the executive branch of government to end corruption, reform laws and impose necessary regulation.

But no. Apparently, the best we can expect from President Hopey Changey is that he will challenge the destruction of the nation by the ruthless, and limitlessly greedy bankers who stuff his pockets and who funded his election.

Occupy Wall St.

Bring it on.

Overturn the tables of the money changers. Set free the pigeons!

Saturday, October 15, 2011

Fox Nation: "American Nazi Party backs Occupy Wall St." LOL

"American Nazi Party declares full support for Occupy Wall Street protests"
Announces the Fox Nation headline.
"There has certainly been no shortage of vile anti-Semitism at the Occupy Wall Street protests."
Fox  continues, before quoting some racialist rubbish from an unidentified source as proof.

One's first reaction may be to say, fuck off. Do they think we don't know who the real Nazis are?

But more to the point, is to observe that the Occupy Wall St movement must really be getting under some peoples' skin, for the American Nazi Party appears to be a wholly Jewish owned operation whose function is to hold up the Nazi scarecrow and terrorize anyone who might say anything critical of Israel, prominent Jewish Americans, bankers in particular, or the Jews-first mentality of some American Jews.

Like the Canadian branch, the post-war American Nazi Party seems to have depended largely if not entirely on the leadership of Jews. Frank Collins, aka Frank Cohen, for example, and Davis Wolfgang Hawke, aka Andrew Britt Greenbaum.

Who uses the Nazi specter to shape opinion in Europe?

In Europe, the Nazi brand may be exclusively employed by the intelligence services. In Germany, it was MI6 who set up a post-war Nazi party. 

In the UK, the British National Party, which is home to various old Nazis, looks very much like an intel op designed to discredit reasonable policies such as bringing the troops home, taking Britain out of the EU, devolving power to regional governments, ending mass immigration to what is among the World's most crowded countries, and developing an industrial policy to protect British jobs and maintain Britain's industrial capability.

Thus, for example, during the 2010 election, Nick Griffin, the BNP leader appeared to do everything possible to insure electoral failure including, moronically featuring a jar of Marmite in a nationally television broadcast, claiming to have been threatened with death by his own PR chief, and, after bloodying the face of a Times reporter, boasting that the incident proved the party "has not gone soft."

Then there was that lone nut Norwegian gunman, Anders Breivik who managed to identify himself with the Nazis and the Zionists at the same time, while condemning the politically correct teachings of the Jewish Frankfurt school.

A bit confusing, that one, although since the police were running an exercise involving an act of terrorism by a lone nut gunman at the exact time that the lone nut Anders Breivik was gunning down teenagers on Utoya Island, it seems a safe bet that the Breivik atrocity was an operation of one of the Western intel agencies.

Certainly it wasn't an agency of Iran or one of the other countries on the US/NATO hit list or they'd have been nuked by now.

Thursday, October 13, 2011

Where did all the jobs go?

As some Americans are saying:
Ten years ago we had Bob Hope, Johny Cash and Steve Jobs. Now we have no hope, no cash and no jobs.
What happened?

In part, what happened was corporate executives like the mean-spirited, foul-mouthed, intolerant Steve Jobs of Apple Corporation and the awesomely clueless Jeff Immelt of GE chose to hire people in China and other places where wages are minimal and environmental protection and workplace safety standards are weak or non-existent, rather than hire their fellow countrymen.

What those sons of bitches have done and continue to do -- with the backing of the political sons (and daughters) of bitches who seek their party's nomination for President -- is export the economy of their country.

The result?

Imports from China and American manufacturing employment 1997-2006 (Source)

Between 1997 and 2006, the number of jobs in America fell, as population increased due to a flood of illegal immigrants and as imports from China zoomed and America's foreign indebtedness soared.

And since 2006, another four million US manufacturing jobs went West East:

Image source

But the corporate pyschopaths who own the US government don't even like Chinese workers, dirt cheap though they may be.

For one thing, the bastards embarrassed Steve Jobs by jumping off the roof of Apple's Chinese i-Pad factory.

To stop that, Apple forced workers to sign an agreement not to commit suicide. But the miserable ingrates kept jumping anyhow.

What to do?

Replace the whole goddam workforce with millions of robots.

Cool, hey? Screw your Chinese slaves and the working stiffs back home out of a livelihood at the same time.

But that's not it all, either.

There are three other important factors.
(1) It's the debt, stupid

Home buyers, urged on by the FED Maestro, Alan Greenspan, who couldn't spot a bubble even if it were inflated with dynamite, drove US private sector debt to an all-time high of 300% of GDP in 2010.


Now the debt is beginning to unwind, which means that demand for everything from cars and other consumer goods, to vacations, new houses, education and healthcare has slumped.

The more demand slumps, the higher unemployment rises, the greater the downward pressure on real wages and hence the greater the urge to reduce debt.

It's called positive feedback.

The corporate elite love it: wages are falling, the stinking masses will have to stay home instead of lousing up the beaches in Florida and Hawaii.

At least they love it now.

Maybe if the Occupy Wall Streeters string up a few stock brokers and bankers, they'll view things differently.

Meantime, the US Government makes feeble gestures to provide "stimulus," which means new wasteful and stupid government spending, which only exacerbates the the plight of the people by increasing the burden of unproductive government.

(2) Time for those death panels?

When the elite kick the shit out the mass of their fellow countrymen, the population begins to sicken and die. One manifestation is collapse of the family, soon followed by a collapse in the birth rate.

The result?

Far too many old people, trying to eke out their savings, spending less and less, but demanding more and more from the taxpayer for drugs, hospitals, and many other forms of welfare.

So, yes, old folks provide jobs alright. But they are jobs that are funded very largely by their children and their children's children, thus adding to the difficulty of working-age adults struggling through the second great depression.

No, we don't advocate euthanasia.

What we do believe is that folks have a right to a job at a living wage so that the Western nations can replace themselves, not be replaced by people from elsewhere who differ in race, culture and creed, however willing they may be to clean toilets or work in the underground economy at below minimum wage.

(3) How do you think Steve Jobs got to be worth $8 billion?


Average income in 2006 was up $60,000 for the top 1 percent of American households (yes that's right, in a single year incomes of the top 1 percent increased by more than the average wage), but up only $430 for the bottom 90 percent of households, resulting in the most inequitable distribution of income since 1928 (Source).

But rich people can only consume so much. So when income becomes increasingly concentrated in the hands of a few, demand for a lot of things slumps, which has become apparent in the US since the Fed-engineered property bubble collapsed, destroying the value of the principle asset of millions of families.

The negative wealth effect impinging on ordinary folks, combined with growing income inequality ensures weak demand and hence slow or negative employment growth.
You might think the politicians would talk about some of these things.

But they never do.

Time for a revolution?

Or are we seeing the emergence of global neo-feudalism, under which the nations of the World will be trashed, and replaced by a single mongrel population, without diversity of race, beauty, culture or faith?

No need to ask what the ruling elite want. But what do ordinary folks want?

Or do ordinary folks no longer believe they have a right to determine their own destiny?

See also:
Canspeccy: Ending Unemployment. Part 1: The Negative Income Tax
Canspeccy: Ending Unemployment. Part 2: Wage Subsidies

Michael Moore's interview with Tony Benn:

"What people said was, 'In the 1930's we had mass unemployment, but we didn't have unemployment during the war. If you can have full employment by killing Germans, why can't you have full employment by building hospitals, building schools ...'"



Patrick Buchanan: Is the New World Order Unravelling?

Tuesday, October 11, 2011

Chris Hedges explains the Occupy Wall St. Moverment, demolishing CBC-featured boorish clown, Kevin O'Leary, in the process

For those who have lacked the time, interest or energy to follow the Occupy Wall St. movement, a good overview is provided by this interview in which Pullitzer-prize-winning former New York Times foreign correspondent, Chris Hedges, demolishes Kevin O'Leary, a boorish twit currently featured by Canada's propaganda agency, the Canadian Broadcorping Castration.



And here's an intelligent, patriotic response to Sean Hannity of Fox News from a couple of US Marines in New York.



And Alan Grayson speaks for Occupy Wall Streeters:



Thanks to Scott C. for the firs video link, and to WRH for the other two. Also thanks to Scott for the link to the following item, which recounts the progress of Stephen Harper's plan to give away the farm:

Crumbling Canadian Sovereignty
I’m sick of people thinking politics is some sort of hobby, like we can just choose to decide it doesn’t have to do with our life, death, happiness and freedom. Looking at the mechanics that underlie our world is not something I do out of boredom. To me, it seems self-evident that we’re on this earth to learn. Learning and gaining experience seems to be what being human is all about. I don’t like reading words on a page/screen. I’d much rather create music or learn to paint but unfortunately, sometimes missing a week’s worth of news is like missing a month. Missing a month is often missing a year.
Few Canadians are aware of the true scope of the horrific G-20 event in Toronto last year. This event got very little coverage during the recent elections despite many calling it “Torontonamo”. There were agent provocateurs (cops dressed up as anarchists), $5 million spent on a fence, $1.2 billion spent on paying 2 or 3 thousand cops overtime so they could arrest and brutalize 1000 innocent people, many of whom were not even taking part in the protest. I even hesitate to say $1.2 billion. Who knows how much of our tax money was actually spent for security. If memory serves me well, it was originally stated it would only be around $170 million, then $300 something million, then $600 million-ish, then $900 million-ish, then finally $1.2 billion. For all we know, it could have been $10 billion.
It’s worthwhile to note that back when the H1N1 scare was happening the government gave dozens of body bags to some native communities. Why body bags? Equally disturbing and strange, it was found that the H1N1 shot caused a 300% increase in narcolepsy in children and this prompted some countries to ban it. Canada went a different route and introduced this mercury-laced H1N1-vaccine into the trivalent seasonal flu shot.
On September 29, 2009, an article came out from SkyWatch Canada titled Forced Vaccination and Quarantine Laws in Canada. That article outlined some shocking laws we have here:
In 1996 Ontario passed the Health Care Consent Act, which allows treatment such as vaccination to be administered without consent of the individual in the case of a loosely defined “Emergency”. In Quebec the Public Health Act clearly states: “Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary, while the public health emergency is in effect, the Government or the Minister, if he or she has been so empowered, may, without delay and without further formality, to protect the health of the population, (1) order compulsory vaccination of the entire population or any part of it against smallpox or any other contagious disease seriously threatening the health of the population and, if necessary, prepare a list of persons or groups who require priority vaccination. ”

In 2005 a new Quarantine Act was passed to deal with the transmission of communicable diseases by travelers entering or leaving Canada. Powers are awarded under this act to a Quarantine Officer to issue an order for a traveler who may have come in contact with someone with a communicable disease, to comply with treatment (ie. vaccination) or any other preventative measure (Section 26). If the traveler refuses to comply with the order he or she may face detention at a quarantine facility, until they decide to comply with treatment (ie. vaccination) or no longer pose a risk (Section 28). The threat posed by this act is diminished by the fact that it only applies to people leaving or entering Canada. Unfortunately there is a real possibility that the definition of a traveler may be expanded to include internal travelers (ie. everyone). The 2004 Public Safety Act (Bill C-7 (2004) formerly Bill C-42 (2002)) amends the Quarantine Act , and in doing so grants powers to the Minister of Health to make an interim order without Parliamentary oversight, to expand the definition of a traveler to include anyone residing in Canada.
The moral of the story is that our government doesn’t care about us and our government is clearly not in our control. Canada’s sovereignty is being insulted at breakneck speed. The corporate oligarchy is what is inevitably responsible for forced inoculation legislation in our countries, and maybe our complacency is also to blame. These insane laws, by the way, never come as a shock to those who are aware of the efforts that have been made to combine Canada, USA, and Mexico into one country and that agenda’s underlying motivation to further consolidate power into one global government. Dana Gabriel recently wrote about Canada’s degenerating sovereignty, noting a “U.S.-Canada perimeter security agreement” that would expand “collaboration in areas of law enforcement and intelligence sharing”. ...

Read more

Saturday, October 8, 2011

Ending Unemployment. Part 2: Wage Subsidies

Image source

The International Labor Organization (ILO) predicts that millions in the developed and developing nations will lose their jobs in the coming months.

Mervyn King, Governor of the Bank of England, says "the global and UK economies had been turned on their heads in the past three months [and] the situation could be even worse than the Great Depression of the 1930s."

So what should governments be doing?

In an earlier post I advocated a negative income tax, an old idea to combat unemployment and poverty promoted by, among others, the late conservative economist and Nobel Laureate, Milton Friedman.

To anyone whose labor is worth more than absolutely nothing, the negative income tax provides both an incentive and an opportunity to work, since it guarantees anyone with a job, however poorly paid, enough income to live on.

The great defect of the negative income tax is that it requires either that:
any increase in market wage received by a low-wage worker is subject to a claw back of the negative tax benefit equivalent to a marginal tax rate approaching 100%; or

the benefit is extended to those with earnings that well exceed the minimum living wage.
In the former case workers have little incentive to maximize their earnings, in the latter case the program becomes excessively expensive.

Another approach is for government to make wage subsidies available to employers by public auction.

An employer bidding successfully for a wage subsidy would pay for it, cash in advance, the subsidy to be paid to the employee by the tax department over the course of the year.

Amounts bid for subsidies, would depend on the quality of labor available and the profitability with which it could be employed, and thus would range from 0.01 dollar/euro/whatever  per hour to an amount close to the full value of the subsidy.

Subsidies could be sold both singly and in batches via an online E-Bay type auction, the number of subsidies offered varying from week to week according to the unemployment rate. The aim would be to drive that number to the full employment rate of around two or three percent as unemployment is currently measured in the United States.

The program should aim to minimize cost by excluding bureaucratic stipulations about qualifications of either employers or employees other than rules designed to prevent fraud. Thus, for example, subsidies should not be linked to place of work, type of work, type of worker or any of the other annoying restrictions that make employers loathe and detest virtually all of the wage subsidy programs that governments have from time to time tried in the past. The aim should be to minimize the cost of program administration to both government and employers.

How a wage subsidy system would skew incentives in the labor market is not altogether obvious. A counter-intuitive consequence would likely be that, to retain trained workers in a labor market offering many new opportunities for low-wage workers, employers might be compelled to pay a premium to retain experienced unsubsidized workers earning little more than the minimum wage.

A wage subsidy program would have many benefits:
first, it would result in massive savings in the cost of multiple bureaucratically complex welfare programs that supposedly care for those without income;.

second, it would provide a tremendous stimulus to many low-skill labor intensive industries, by making available millions of workers at third-world wages, thereby increasing total output of goods and services, raising the general level of prosperity, and increasing business tax revenues to government;

third, it would largely eliminate the disaffected, criminally inclined underclass, which currently lacks incentive to acquire education or work-place skills, thereby greatly reducing unemployment-related crime and its various policing and prison costs;

fourth, it would reduce the despair of the unemployed and the mental health problems that such despair can create. Currently, something like 40% of Europeans and 20% of Americans are diagnosed with some form of mental ill health at any one time. Much of this illness is related to economic stress, and much of that stress is likely unemployment related.
The cost of subsidizing the 40 million or so jobs required in America would be in the range of $100 to 200 billion dollars per year. Barely a drop in the bucket compared with the seemingly endless bailouts required to maintain the banking class in the style to which they have become accustomed.

With adjustment for differences in population and living costs, the cost of an employment subsidy program in other countries would be comparable: say $10 to 20 billion a year in Canada, or not a whole lot more than the Government of Canada was happy to spend entertaining representatives of the G8 and the G20 for a couple of days.

See also:
How to end unemployment. Part 1: The Negative Income Tax
Why economics is bunk
America's inflationary depression
USA versus China: Wage Convergence, Wealth Divergence and Global Hegemony
US Economy: Expecting the Unexpected
USA Boom or Bust: The Next Decade
Why China Booms While America Slumps
China's Economy Already Larger Than America's

NY Times: The Right Minimum Wage: $0.00