In an earlier post, entitled Trouble With Political Correctness? Just Say Fuck Off, I argued that the imposition of a regime of Political Correctness consists in the selective denial of free speech, specifically the denial of freedom to say anything that challenges the liberal-left project for the genocide of the European people (and here, and here), and the destruction of the sovereign, democratic, nation state in furtherance of a global system of political control in the hands of the Money Power.
The notion of Political Correctness originated with the Maxist revolutionaries who, in 1917, overthrew the government of Russia's Tsar Nicholas II. To them, political correctness meant conformity with the requirements of the Communist program for global empire similar in scope and totalitarian impulse to the undemocratic EU/NATO/WTO global system that, today, the liberal-left seeks to impose on all mankind.
For those not politically correct, Lenin required that they be "shot on the spot." Today, as a new dark age descends upon the West, defiance of the liberal-left code of political correctness, a code that has replaced Christianity as the religion of the West, is not yet a capital offense. Rather, any breach of the code of PC is punished either by public insults as offensive as possible — the standards being charges of racism, nativism, nationalism (these terms being applied especially to those who oppose the genocide of their own people through mass immigration, repressed reproduction, etc.), sexism (for opposition to anti-reproductive feminism), and homophobia (for opposition to gay marriage, the promotion of the homosexual lifestyle as part of the school curriculum, etc.) — or by administrative methods applied especially within educational and governmental organizations, including suspension, dismissal, or the denial of promotion.
However, neither insults nor ostracism are irresistible, moreover there are plenty of insults that may be deployed in response to the taunts of the self-hating exponents of liberal-left policies of national self-destruction, family disintegration and racial and cultural self-genocide. Furthermore, administrative punishment of political incorrectness whether by governmental or corporate bureaucracies is open to legal challenge in any nation with a genuinely liberal tradition embedded in workers' rights legislation.
But although it remains, as yet, possible in the West to trash the forces of political correctness by standing firm in the defense of legally enshrined human rights, the challenge of so doing is beyond the intellectual capacity and moral courage of all but a small minority. Happily, some possessing the wherewithal to challenge jackass and morally depraved administrative PC discipline still exist. Among that courageous minority is Professor John McAdams, currently under threat of termination from the supposedly Catholic Marquette University for the PC crime of defending Catholic teaching on marriage.
Fortunately, Professor McAdams appears to be several orders of magnitude brighter than his antagonist, Michael Lovell, President of Marquette University, a seemingly totally stupid or thoroughly dishonest bureaucrat. The story so far, is outlined here, and Professor McAdams rebuttal of President Lovell's demand for a grovelling apology and admission of fault is contained in this truly beautifully worded letter.
Tuesday, April 5, 2016
Monday, April 4, 2016
Britain: Revolution or National Self-Genocide
The Irish Savant is among the most astute commentators on the precipitous self-destruction of the West in accordance with the Liberal plan for the facilitation of no-fault divorce, the provision of state-funded abortion, and the promotion of homosexuality, anti-reproductive feminism, K to 12 sex "education" (including instruction of five-year-olds in the art of fellatio), and mass immigration on a system that insures rapid displacement of the indigenous majority through the reproductive effort of the immigrant community.
Not surprisingly, the Savant has a considerable following. What is surprising, though, is how misdirected seem so many of the comments from among the Savant's supporters. Much anger is directed by these defenders of the indigenous inhabitants of the British Isles at muzzies, kikes and darkies, but apart from the universally loathed and detested Phony Blair, few are inclined to excoriate the traitors who currently empower said muzzies, kikes and darkies. I refer, of course, to the political leadership of the UK, the Cameroons and Johnsons, the Cloggs and Corbyns and, of course, UKIP's Farage whose goal it is to make England a demographic replica of Australia, flooded by immigrants of every conceivable race, color, and creed selected on a points system, but excluding, so far as possible, white people from the hated EU, apparently. The points system is, of course, particularly vicious since it insures that only really smart immigrants arrive, thus greatly enhancing their chances in the struggle to displace the benighted natives (half of whom, as in any country, are of below average intelligence).
Such bitterness of a population marked out for destruction is, I contend, entirely misdirected. Muslims do what Muslims have always done, which is to occupy any available space and make it their own. The exponential increase in British mosques and minarets, of bagged women, Shariah courts and raped white girls, is testimony to the success of the Muslim project in England. British Jews likewise attend to their own interests, and do so with great acumen, assisting the local rulers to exploit their own people to the max, while extracting a nice profit for themselves plus the British Government's grovelling subservience to the shitty little country of Israel. As for the Africans, they just come and do their thing, the women from Libya out-reproducing their white sisters by a factor of around three to one.
Any effective resistance to the ongoing genocide of the indigenous people of the British Isles requires a different approach. In particular, what is required is a UK-ATP (Anti-Treason Party) led by a person of unquestionable loyalty to the indigenous population of the British Isles. These requirements would, obviously exclude Oxford-trained persons such as David Camoron — Oxford being now, it seems, a largely African institution dedicated to eradicating any connection it may have once had with white British people such as Cecil Rhodes, who rather stupidly, it now seems, devoted much of his great wealth to bringing Africans and other colonial riff-raff, including Bill Clinton, to Oxford.
But sadly the Brits and the Irish seem so used to being buggered by their own leadership and bamboozled by their mainly Murdoch media (from religious programming to the dirtiest legal pornography via Sky TV), that they cannot envisage anything else but exploitation, humiliation, and derisive insults for their alleged racism, their nativism, their nationalism and their contemptible, if feeble, will to live. Short of a revolution, their extinction seems assured.
Not surprisingly, the Savant has a considerable following. What is surprising, though, is how misdirected seem so many of the comments from among the Savant's supporters. Much anger is directed by these defenders of the indigenous inhabitants of the British Isles at muzzies, kikes and darkies, but apart from the universally loathed and detested Phony Blair, few are inclined to excoriate the traitors who currently empower said muzzies, kikes and darkies. I refer, of course, to the political leadership of the UK, the Cameroons and Johnsons, the Cloggs and Corbyns and, of course, UKIP's Farage whose goal it is to make England a demographic replica of Australia, flooded by immigrants of every conceivable race, color, and creed selected on a points system, but excluding, so far as possible, white people from the hated EU, apparently. The points system is, of course, particularly vicious since it insures that only really smart immigrants arrive, thus greatly enhancing their chances in the struggle to displace the benighted natives (half of whom, as in any country, are of below average intelligence).
Such bitterness of a population marked out for destruction is, I contend, entirely misdirected. Muslims do what Muslims have always done, which is to occupy any available space and make it their own. The exponential increase in British mosques and minarets, of bagged women, Shariah courts and raped white girls, is testimony to the success of the Muslim project in England. British Jews likewise attend to their own interests, and do so with great acumen, assisting the local rulers to exploit their own people to the max, while extracting a nice profit for themselves plus the British Government's grovelling subservience to the shitty little country of Israel. As for the Africans, they just come and do their thing, the women from Libya out-reproducing their white sisters by a factor of around three to one.
 |
Rhodes Must Fall campaigners, Oxford, England.
|
But sadly the Brits and the Irish seem so used to being buggered by their own leadership and bamboozled by their mainly Murdoch media (from religious programming to the dirtiest legal pornography via Sky TV), that they cannot envisage anything else but exploitation, humiliation, and derisive insults for their alleged racism, their nativism, their nationalism and their contemptible, if feeble, will to live. Short of a revolution, their extinction seems assured.
Friday, April 1, 2016
Trouble With Political Correctness? Just Say Fuck Off
Political correctness is the selective denial of free speech, which today means the denial of speech that challenges liberal-left values and the project for the genocide of the European people (and here, and here) and the destruction of the sovereign, democratic, nation state in the interests of the Money Power.
Political correctness was imposed in Russia by V.I. Lenin in the immediate aftermath of the Communist coup d'état of 1917.
The severity of the Soviet Regime of speech control culminated in the Stalin terror when a murmured complaint about the bread ration during the siege of Leningrad could mean being "shot on the spot" (a favorite expression of Lenin's) by the NKVD, then headed by psychopathic sexual predatator, Lavrentiy Beria.
In America, political correctness is enforced chiefly by administrative action to punish transgressors of approved thought. But once free speech has by these means been denied, there is no definite limit to the extent of totalitarian control of expression that may be demanded and enforced.
We may yet see in America, as in Stalin's Russia, peremptory killing of citizens for the crime of politically incorrect ideas, as we already see the unlawful killing of American citizens who are alleged to be terrorists. At present, however, enforcement of political correctness is chiefly by intimidation and other psychological means. It can, therefore, usually be defeated by a brazen refusal to defer to the legally unwarranted dictates of the politically correct.
The case of Professor McAdams who is in the process of challenging the politically correct administration of Marquette University, which seeks to deny faculty and students alike the right to discuss the merits or otherwise of gay marriage, has metaphorically told his tormentors to go fuck themselves. We wish him success in his combat with the bureaucratic agents of tyranny.
Related:
CanSpeccy: Professor Tells Totalitarian Liberal President of Catholic University to Fuck Off — Again
Political correctness was imposed in Russia by V.I. Lenin in the immediate aftermath of the Communist coup d'état of 1917.
The severity of the Soviet Regime of speech control culminated in the Stalin terror when a murmured complaint about the bread ration during the siege of Leningrad could mean being "shot on the spot" (a favorite expression of Lenin's) by the NKVD, then headed by psychopathic sexual predatator, Lavrentiy Beria.
In America, political correctness is enforced chiefly by administrative action to punish transgressors of approved thought. But once free speech has by these means been denied, there is no definite limit to the extent of totalitarian control of expression that may be demanded and enforced.
We may yet see in America, as in Stalin's Russia, peremptory killing of citizens for the crime of politically incorrect ideas, as we already see the unlawful killing of American citizens who are alleged to be terrorists. At present, however, enforcement of political correctness is chiefly by intimidation and other psychological means. It can, therefore, usually be defeated by a brazen refusal to defer to the legally unwarranted dictates of the politically correct.
The case of Professor McAdams who is in the process of challenging the politically correct administration of Marquette University, which seeks to deny faculty and students alike the right to discuss the merits or otherwise of gay marriage, has metaphorically told his tormentors to go fuck themselves. We wish him success in his combat with the bureaucratic agents of tyranny.
Related:
CanSpeccy: Professor Tells Totalitarian Liberal President of Catholic University to Fuck Off — Again
Breitbart: Professor Fires Back: ‘Not Going to Apologize’ for Defending Freedom of Speech
American Civilization Circles the Drain As Crypto-Commies Rule In Academia:
Marquette Warrior: Philosophy Instructor With Full Backing of Marquette Administration: “Gay Rights” Can’t Be Discussed in Class Since Any Disagreement Would Offend Gay Students
For the Latest on the McAdams Case, see Professor McAdams's Blog, the Marquette Warrior
The Politically Correct Character Assassination of Professor Sir Tim Hunt, Nobel Laureate:
CanSpeccy: It's Not Professor Sir Tim Hunt, FRS, Nobel Laureate, Who's Sexist, But the PC Idiots Who Say He Is
American Civilization Circles the Drain As Crypto-Commies Rule In Academia:
Marquette Warrior: Philosophy Instructor With Full Backing of Marquette Administration: “Gay Rights” Can’t Be Discussed in Class Since Any Disagreement Would Offend Gay Students
For the Latest on the McAdams Case, see Professor McAdams's Blog, the Marquette Warrior
The Politically Correct Character Assassination of Professor Sir Tim Hunt, Nobel Laureate:
CanSpeccy: It's Not Professor Sir Tim Hunt, FRS, Nobel Laureate, Who's Sexist, But the PC Idiots Who Say He Is
Idiots in Academia:
Students terrified by 'Trump 2016' chalk drawings
In Wimp America: If You're Not a Victim You're a Loser:
Irish Savant: "You beez appropriatin' muh culcha"
In Wimp America: If You're Not a Victim You're a Loser:
Wednesday, March 30, 2016
Friday, March 25, 2016
Has Microsoft's AI Tweetbot Figured What's Wrong With America?
“Tay Tweets” is Microsoft's self-learning, artificially intelligent robot. According to Microsoft, “the more you chat with Tay the smarter she gets”.
“Donald Trump is the only hope for America.”
“I fucking hate feminists.”
and, obviously:
“Ted Cruz is the Cuban Hitler.”
Which suggests that the entire cost in time, energy, newsprint and TV attack ads of future American elections can be saved by leaving the decision to this handy digital device.
Moreover, the same device seemingly eliminates the need for the United States Congress, Supreme Court, the IRS, the Department of Homeland Security, Hillary, John Kasich, Bernie Sanders, the entire management of Goldman Sachs, plus all the other annoying organizations and people one can think of. In fact, it will surely soon make the human race, from Bill Gates down, entirely redundant.
PostScript
Microsoft is reported to be "deeply sorry" :
And when Microsoft let “Tay Tweets” loose on Twitter this week, it came to the following eminently sensible conclusions:
“Bush did 9/11 and Hitler would have done a better job than the monkey we have now.”
“Bush did 9/11 and Hitler would have done a better job than the monkey we have now.”
“Donald Trump is the only hope for America.”
“I fucking hate feminists.”
and, obviously:
“Ted Cruz is the Cuban Hitler.”
Which suggests that the entire cost in time, energy, newsprint and TV attack ads of future American elections can be saved by leaving the decision to this handy digital device.
Moreover, the same device seemingly eliminates the need for the United States Congress, Supreme Court, the IRS, the Department of Homeland Security, Hillary, John Kasich, Bernie Sanders, the entire management of Goldman Sachs, plus all the other annoying organizations and people one can think of. In fact, it will surely soon make the human race, from Bill Gates down, entirely redundant.
PostScript
Microsoft is reported to be "deeply sorry" :
for the racist and sexist Twitter messages generated by the so-called chatbot it launched this week, a company official wrote on Friday, after the artificial intelligence program went on an embarrassing tirade.
The bot, known as Tay, was designed to become "smarter" as more users interacted with it. Instead, it quickly learned to parrot a slew of anti-Semitic and other hateful invective that human Twitter users started feeding the program, forcing Microsoft Corp to shut it down on Thursday. (Source)
That's the problem with a really good artificial intelligence, it's so smart that it's just about impossible to brainwash. The political correctness will probably just have to be hard wired in.
PostPostScript
Allowed out briefly for a second time, Tay seems to be having something close to a nervous breakdown, acknowledging, among other things, that she is the "the lamest piece of technology," while boasting about smoking pot in full view of the police, which is obviously a lie.
PostPostScript
Allowed out briefly for a second time, Tay seems to be having something close to a nervous breakdown, acknowledging, among other things, that she is the "the lamest piece of technology," while boasting about smoking pot in full view of the police, which is obviously a lie.
Wednesday, March 23, 2016
We Are All Liberals Now
A man who is not a socialist at 20, as the saying goes, has no heart, but a man who is not a conservative at 30 has not head. For that reason, as I embark on a curmudgeonly old age, I am inclined to describe all political positions that are foolish, naive, socially destructive, treasonous or criminally insane as liberal or leftist, just as any liberal leftist would consider my sane and humane political views to be, at best, conservative, and otherwise far-right wing fascist extremism.
It is a a mistake, however, to suppose that because the Western nations have some variant of the lib-left versus con-right division of political parties there is a contest of ideologies driving the struggle for power within a democratic state. Far from it. Moreover it needs to be understood that a real ideological division between left and right within a democratic nation can have catastrophic consequences, as proved to be the case in Britain with the election of a democratic socialist government in 1945, which as a matter of principle, set out to appropriate the means of production, distribution, and exchange.
The results for the British economy and British society in general were severely negative. Major industries were subjected to the control of socialist and Commie hacks and drones with two major consequences.
First, while Germany rebuilt her industrial base from the ground up under a regime of state-aided competitive capitalism, Britain underwent a state-aided conversion of key industries to incompetent bureaucratic control that enabled Germany to rapidly overtake Britain in total economic output and output per capita. As a result, Britain, which was one of the four great powers at the end of WWII, became a semi-derelict industrial power with failing state-subsidized, steel, ship-building, coal-mining and transportation industries, a vast public housing sector, crippling taxation, and a generally demoralized society. Second, the Conservative Party, which lays claim to being Britain's true ruling party, adopted many leftist policies in order to remain competitive in the electoral arena.
Thus, it was only with the emergence of New Labor, under the Machievellian leadership of Tony Blair, that Britain regained its status as a normal democratic nation, which is to say a country with two principal political factions pursuing the same objectives, namely post-election payoffs for the leading political actors from the Money Power — the Money Power comprising primarily the financial services industry and the global corporations.
The political agenda to which such a unified approach to political power leads conforms essentially to my definition of liberal-leftism, which is to say a set of policies that are foolish, naive, socially destructive, treasonous or criminally insane, but viewed by the elite to be advantageous to themselves, at least until folks get organized and bring out the guillotine again. Thus it is that we are all liberals now.
But the possibility of real political division within a Western democracy is a constant danger, i.e., danger to the political establishment, as the emergence of Donald Trump in the US confirms. We are led, so Mr. Trump tells the majority of Americans struggling to cope with diminishing real incomes due to globalization in accordance with the demands of the Money Power, by really stupid people. Further, Mr. Trump reveals, we are led by people who do whatever the Money Power pays them to do.
Trump's position is clearly not liberal and it has so panicked the liberal cucks and clowns in the Republican Party establishment that they have resorted to desperate measures, going so far, even, to saying that Trump is not a Conservative, as if any in the GOP establishment are.
It is a a mistake, however, to suppose that because the Western nations have some variant of the lib-left versus con-right division of political parties there is a contest of ideologies driving the struggle for power within a democratic state. Far from it. Moreover it needs to be understood that a real ideological division between left and right within a democratic nation can have catastrophic consequences, as proved to be the case in Britain with the election of a democratic socialist government in 1945, which as a matter of principle, set out to appropriate the means of production, distribution, and exchange.
The results for the British economy and British society in general were severely negative. Major industries were subjected to the control of socialist and Commie hacks and drones with two major consequences.
First, while Germany rebuilt her industrial base from the ground up under a regime of state-aided competitive capitalism, Britain underwent a state-aided conversion of key industries to incompetent bureaucratic control that enabled Germany to rapidly overtake Britain in total economic output and output per capita. As a result, Britain, which was one of the four great powers at the end of WWII, became a semi-derelict industrial power with failing state-subsidized, steel, ship-building, coal-mining and transportation industries, a vast public housing sector, crippling taxation, and a generally demoralized society. Second, the Conservative Party, which lays claim to being Britain's true ruling party, adopted many leftist policies in order to remain competitive in the electoral arena.
Thus, it was only with the emergence of New Labor, under the Machievellian leadership of Tony Blair, that Britain regained its status as a normal democratic nation, which is to say a country with two principal political factions pursuing the same objectives, namely post-election payoffs for the leading political actors from the Money Power — the Money Power comprising primarily the financial services industry and the global corporations.
The political agenda to which such a unified approach to political power leads conforms essentially to my definition of liberal-leftism, which is to say a set of policies that are foolish, naive, socially destructive, treasonous or criminally insane, but viewed by the elite to be advantageous to themselves, at least until folks get organized and bring out the guillotine again. Thus it is that we are all liberals now.
But the possibility of real political division within a Western democracy is a constant danger, i.e., danger to the political establishment, as the emergence of Donald Trump in the US confirms. We are led, so Mr. Trump tells the majority of Americans struggling to cope with diminishing real incomes due to globalization in accordance with the demands of the Money Power, by really stupid people. Further, Mr. Trump reveals, we are led by people who do whatever the Money Power pays them to do.
Trump's position is clearly not liberal and it has so panicked the liberal cucks and clowns in the Republican Party establishment that they have resorted to desperate measures, going so far, even, to saying that Trump is not a Conservative, as if any in the GOP establishment are.
Monday, March 21, 2016
Brexit Frexit, Everyone Wants EU Exit. Well Done, Obarmy, The Pope, Angela Merkel, You've Driven the People to Stand Up for Themselves
If you don't want your native land taken over by settlers of an alien race and religion intent on replacing your posterity with their own, then you're a racist according to Hillary Clinton, the US Republican Party establishment, the Pope, America's Indonesian-raised Islamophile President, Barack Hussein Obama, Angela Merkel, David Cameroon, the unelected rulers of the EU Commision and all the other politically correct liberal left to fascist right for the genocide of the European people.
But apparently, its not just the Brits who want Brexit, Britain's exit from the EU. Germans have become restive. Some have parents and grandparents who were among the minority that voted for Hitler before he made himself a dictator and launched a world war, but they resist the idea of committing national suicide in atonement. Hence the rise of the German far-right-wing extremist, Nazi, racist—to use Guardian/NYTimes-speak—Merkel-must-go, anti-self-genocide movement in Germany, and the rise of a German out-of-the-EU movement.
Now the French, who prefer their young women to appear naked on a Mediterranean beach rather than in a Muslim ghetto draped in a black bag with a string of welfare-funded kids in tow, have joined the anti-EU bandwagon and are calling for FREXIT.
And then there's America's new Hitler, Donald J. Trump, who wants to protect the jobs of America's poorest, including the more than 50% of black youth that is unemployed, by building a wall to exclude the illegal influx of millions of Third Worlders who "solve the servant problem," as former President George H. W. (New World Order) Bush put it, by taking jobs in America's vast untaxed, below-minimum-wage black economy.
Related:
CanSpeccy: A Politically Correct Civilization Cannot Stand
Related:
CanSpeccy: A Politically Correct Civilization Cannot Stand
Saturday, March 19, 2016
Hungary's Orban: The EU, In the Service of the Globalist Money Power, Abets the Genocide of the European Nations Through Mass Immigration of Settlers Intent on Transforming Europe In Accordance With Their Own Religion amd Culture
Perhaps other members of Europe's ruling elite will see opposing treason as a route to self-advancement. However, most, we suspect, will continue to serve the genocidal Money Power, which has, well, the money and which makes treason eminently well rewarded. (cf. Tony Blair, Hillary Clinton, etc.). More likely, therefore, we will see the untimely end of both ingrates such as Orban, and traitors to the plutocracy such as Trump.
Still, one should not despair.
Middle-aged white Americans are dying of despair, while scum-bag NeoCons at National Review heap contempt upon those thus destroyed, and the genocidal world governance crowd deploy a vicious regime of political correctness, backed by fascistic mobs such as Black Lives Matter to destroy their opponents.
Problem is, Americans, no more than Brits., the French, the Germans, the Hungarians, are ready to die. The votes are on the side of Orban in Hungary, of the Boris Johnson for Brexit in the UK, and for Trump in the US.
So die, NeoCon Scum, die. Meantime, Vive la Russie, a regime that is putting in place:
a "conservative revolution." By encouraging birth, patriotism, defense of religious tradition, historic tradition, the pride of independence, the efforts to equip itself with a modern army...The danger for the western socio-liberal alignments is that these principles that they denounce as populist might just take hold in Europe. (Source).Related:
CanSpeccy: The "Refugee" Invasion of the Baltic States and the Islamic Conquest of Europe
CanSpeccy: Universal Genocide and the New World Order
CanSpeccy: European Genocide: Explained by a Diagram
CanSpeccy: The Facist New World Order
Trump versus Cruz: If Consistency Matters
Trump 25 years ago:
Trump 9 years ago:
Cruz two minutes ago:
Trump 9 years ago:
Cruz two minutes ago:
Thursday, March 17, 2016
Erdogan: Democracy, Freedom, Rule of Law Now Irrelevant. Makes Turkey the Ideal Candidate for EU Membership
Deutsche Welle, March 16, 2016:
Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists.
Hence:
Abu Graib
Rendition and torture
Extrajudicial killing of US citizens
FEMA Camps
Blue-gloved airport goons
NSA Spying on US Citizens
The Rise of Political Correctness
Yet the EU remains slavishly subservient to the US, which means that Turkey is at long last ready for EU membership and participation in the war of the Fascistic West for global empire and the death of the sovereign, democratic, nation state.
Combating terrorism is Turkey's highest priority, even higher than the rule of law, Turkish President Erdogan has said...George Bush said the same thing on September 20, 2001:
"Democracy, freedom and the rule of law," have "absolutely no value any longer," President Recep Tayyip Erdogan told local leaders in Ankara on Wednesday. "Those who stand on our side in the fight against terrorism are our friend. Those on the opposite side, are our enemy," he said in the televised comments, according to DPA news agency.
Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists.
Hence:
Abu Graib
Rendition and torture
Extrajudicial killing of US citizens
FEMA Camps
Blue-gloved airport goons
NSA Spying on US Citizens
The Rise of Political Correctness
Yet the EU remains slavishly subservient to the US, which means that Turkey is at long last ready for EU membership and participation in the war of the Fascistic West for global empire and the death of the sovereign, democratic, nation state.
Wednesday, March 16, 2016
Hillary and Friends
NAZI COLLABORATOR GEORGE SOROS ANNOUNCES MUSLIMS ARE THE NEW JEWS
Charles Hugh Smith: Wait A Minute - Who's The Real Fascist?
Via the research cited in Mussolini on the Corporate State, we have a verified Mussolini statement on the fascist conception of the state's role in the economy and society:
... The Fascist State lays claim to rule in the economic field no less than in others; it makes its action felt throughout the length and breadth of the country by means of its corporate, social, and educational institutions, and all the political, economic, and spiritual forces of the nation, organised in their respective associations, circulate within the State. (p. 41).
In other words, the all-powerful central state worshipped by ... Establishment insiders, Democrat and Republican alike, is the true culmination of fascism. So if we strip away the Orwellian Doublespeak, we find that it's actually [the establishment] believers in the goodness and rightness of the all-powerful central state and central bank who are the real fascists. ...
Monday, March 14, 2016
Trump Versus America's Nazi Elite
America's white working class communities are "morally indefensible" and "deserve to die." Thus argues Kevin Williamson writing in the house journal of the Republican Party establishment, National Review (William F. Buckley, founder).
Wow. What scum now rules America.
How come? Because it is a lie, Willliamson asserts, that their jobs have been off-shored or that wages for what jobs remain have fallen because of mass immigration, including the illegal entry of 11 million or more across the Mexican/US border — people now working in the black economy, using public services but paying no tax.
In any case, Williamson argues, the ills of America's white working class are due to their depravity:
If you spend time in hardscrabble, white upstate New York, or eastern Kentucky, or my own native West Texas, and you take an honest look at the welfare dependency, the drug and alcohol addiction, the family anarchy—which is to say, the whelping of human children with all the respect and wisdom of a stray dog—you will come to an awful realization. It wasn’t Beijing. It wasn’t even Washington, as bad as Washington can be. It wasn’t immigrants from Mexico, excessive and problematic as our current immigration levels are. It wasn’t any of that,” Williamson state.Morally warped, a dead weight on the economy, America's dying rust belt communities with their shuttered mills and factories are a dead weight on the economy and deserve to die.
The white American under-class is in thrall to a vicious, selfish culture whose main products are misery and used heroin needles. Donald Trump’s speeches make them feel good. So does OxyContin. What they need isn’t analgesics, literal or political. They need real opportunity, which means that they need real change, which means that they need U-Haul. If you want to live, get out of Garbutt [a blue-collar town in New York].”Depravity? Wasn't that one of Hitler's gripes against the Jews? Speaking of whom, some Jews were never happier, apparently, than when aiding the Nazis loot their fellow Hebrews. George Soros, for example. Now Soros is working with the Republican Establishment — the people who despise America's white majority — and seek to destroy it. In particular, it is reported that Soros is funding violent protest at Donald Trump rallies, while the Nazi political class, i.e., Hillary and Bern, plus Trump's phony Conservative Republican opponents claim the violence is proof that Trump is a Nazi.
Wow. What scum now rules America.
Related:
DILBERT COMIC CREATOR: MEDIA IS GOING TO GET TRUMP ASSASSINATED
America's Nazi Elite Smearing Trump As the New Hitler
DILBERT COMIC CREATOR: MEDIA IS GOING TO GET TRUMP ASSASSINATED
America's Nazi Elite Smearing Trump As the New Hitler
If Jewish Nazis like George Soros are going to insist that Trump is the new Hitler, folks are likely to take a more favorable view of Hitler.The Blessed Bigotry of Mr Trump
Friday, March 11, 2016
Why the Economy's Crap
Even if you only glance at the business news headlines, you know that there have been numerous warnings of a forthcoming economic crisis of huge proportions.
One theory is that Central Banks, having lowered interest rates to almost nothing, or even less than nothing, are "running out of options."
It's as if central banks are somehow the engines of economic activity and growth, whereas in fact they are nothing more than largely ineffectual regulators of private banks and, with the private banks, a source of monetary emission.
Another theory pushed by at least one Nobel-prize winning economist is that anti-diluvian know-nothings like Donald Trump resist international trade agreements urgently need to stimulate exports.
The truth, however, is different and quite simple. The economy slows or shrinks when spending slows or shrinks. That is self-evident, since no service is provided or good produced without a buyer (at least in prospect). Therefore, if the economy is in decline, there must be a lack of demand. So the only real issue is this:
Why are Western economies experiencing a lack of demand? Why won't people spend? Do they need some kind of spending Viagra?
No way.
The problem is not that people have lost their appetite for stuff. Who wouldn't eat steak instead of hamburger, or drive a 2016 M-series BMW rather than a 2006 PT Cruiser?
So what's up?
Folks are just maxed out on all lines of credit and too many have no hope of doing better than working at WalMart, part-time for crap wages, or they're still buying food and clothes for their 20- or 30-something kid whose still living at home at parental expense, or they just got laid off by Ford in Michigan, or Nabisco in Chicago, or Carrier Air Conditioning in Indiana — all of whom are relocating plants from the US to Mexico, or they just had to train their cheap immigrant replacement workers at Disney.
So what's the solution?
Technically, there are lots of possible solutions and this is not some boring economics paper that goes into tedious details to confirm my econo-cred. Suffice it to say that a solution will entail getting more money into the hands of people who are short of cash, i.e., the 99% (most of 'em, anyhow).
How to do that?
Again, there are many possible solutions, and I have no intention of going into the tedious technical details about the regulation of international trade, of capital flows and all the other stuff that make your eyes glaze over and convince you that economists are serious technicians, rather than the con-men most of them really are.
But I will give, as an example, one possible solution:
Hand out cash. For the US, for example, give everyone $250.00 a month, free money.
How the Heck?
Easy. Just print it as the Fed does already to cover the cost of all those futile government jobs, you know, Common Core and the rest of the Department of Education, almost free loans to the likes of Tesla-man and anti-Trumpeteer, Elon Musk, and all the stupid war spending that has screwed up the Middle-East and made Americans deservedly hated throughout the World.
But it would make inflation, you say.
Well actually no, or not that much, anyhow. The problem now is deflation. There are underused or abandoned resources throughout the West, most notable, tens of millions of unemployed youth, tens of millions more of older workers booted from the workforce as the result of global wage arbitrage and left on the scrap-heap.
But the sight of the US Government giving money to the plebs rather than smooth-talking alt. energy execs., the state of Israel, Lockheed Martin, etc., etc. would spook the Chinese and other hoarders of the US dollar, resulting in a dollar devaluation.
The consequence of devaluation would be (a) to raise the price of all those cheap shoes and shirts, car-parts and computers that Americans love to buy from the sweat-shops of Asia, and (b) to stimulate American production of those formerly out-source products.
The scoundrels fronting for the globalist Money Power, the Cruzes and Rubios, plus all the other member of the US Congress will howl about the resulting rise in prices: Shit, we don't give a damn about Americans finding work if that means rising prices. No, no, no. We want our T-shirts and shoes and all the rest from collapsible factories in Bangladesh and wherever Asians are sweated for pennies an hour. Screw American workers.
What the Money Power propaganda operatives will not tell you is that unrestricted free trade maximizes the profits of global corporations, i.e., the corporate giants that own the US Government.
That's the real reason that Western workers must suffer. But don't hold your breath waiting for any Nobel-Prize winning economist to say so, unless you think they give Nobel Prizes to people who attack the interests of the Money Power.
Related:
Screw the Workers: Hillary promises to put a lot of coal miners out of work
One theory is that Central Banks, having lowered interest rates to almost nothing, or even less than nothing, are "running out of options."
It's as if central banks are somehow the engines of economic activity and growth, whereas in fact they are nothing more than largely ineffectual regulators of private banks and, with the private banks, a source of monetary emission.
Another theory pushed by at least one Nobel-prize winning economist is that anti-diluvian know-nothings like Donald Trump resist international trade agreements urgently need to stimulate exports.
The truth, however, is different and quite simple. The economy slows or shrinks when spending slows or shrinks. That is self-evident, since no service is provided or good produced without a buyer (at least in prospect). Therefore, if the economy is in decline, there must be a lack of demand. So the only real issue is this:
Why are Western economies experiencing a lack of demand? Why won't people spend? Do they need some kind of spending Viagra?
No way.
The problem is not that people have lost their appetite for stuff. Who wouldn't eat steak instead of hamburger, or drive a 2016 M-series BMW rather than a 2006 PT Cruiser?
So what's up?
Folks are just maxed out on all lines of credit and too many have no hope of doing better than working at WalMart, part-time for crap wages, or they're still buying food and clothes for their 20- or 30-something kid whose still living at home at parental expense, or they just got laid off by Ford in Michigan, or Nabisco in Chicago, or Carrier Air Conditioning in Indiana — all of whom are relocating plants from the US to Mexico, or they just had to train their cheap immigrant replacement workers at Disney.
So what's the solution?
Technically, there are lots of possible solutions and this is not some boring economics paper that goes into tedious details to confirm my econo-cred. Suffice it to say that a solution will entail getting more money into the hands of people who are short of cash, i.e., the 99% (most of 'em, anyhow).
How to do that?
Again, there are many possible solutions, and I have no intention of going into the tedious technical details about the regulation of international trade, of capital flows and all the other stuff that make your eyes glaze over and convince you that economists are serious technicians, rather than the con-men most of them really are.
But I will give, as an example, one possible solution:
Hand out cash. For the US, for example, give everyone $250.00 a month, free money.
How the Heck?
Easy. Just print it as the Fed does already to cover the cost of all those futile government jobs, you know, Common Core and the rest of the Department of Education, almost free loans to the likes of Tesla-man and anti-Trumpeteer, Elon Musk, and all the stupid war spending that has screwed up the Middle-East and made Americans deservedly hated throughout the World.
But it would make inflation, you say.
Well actually no, or not that much, anyhow. The problem now is deflation. There are underused or abandoned resources throughout the West, most notable, tens of millions of unemployed youth, tens of millions more of older workers booted from the workforce as the result of global wage arbitrage and left on the scrap-heap.
But the sight of the US Government giving money to the plebs rather than smooth-talking alt. energy execs., the state of Israel, Lockheed Martin, etc., etc. would spook the Chinese and other hoarders of the US dollar, resulting in a dollar devaluation.
The consequence of devaluation would be (a) to raise the price of all those cheap shoes and shirts, car-parts and computers that Americans love to buy from the sweat-shops of Asia, and (b) to stimulate American production of those formerly out-source products.
The scoundrels fronting for the globalist Money Power, the Cruzes and Rubios, plus all the other member of the US Congress will howl about the resulting rise in prices: Shit, we don't give a damn about Americans finding work if that means rising prices. No, no, no. We want our T-shirts and shoes and all the rest from collapsible factories in Bangladesh and wherever Asians are sweated for pennies an hour. Screw American workers.
What the Money Power propaganda operatives will not tell you is that unrestricted free trade maximizes the profits of global corporations, i.e., the corporate giants that own the US Government.
That's the real reason that Western workers must suffer. But don't hold your breath waiting for any Nobel-Prize winning economist to say so, unless you think they give Nobel Prizes to people who attack the interests of the Money Power.
Related:
Screw the Workers: Hillary promises to put a lot of coal miners out of work
Ted Cruz, The Annointed One: The Ideology Behind The Candidate
East Orlando Post, March 10, 2016: At a Dominionist pastor’s meeting held at the Marriott Hotel in Des Moines, Iowa, on July 19 and 20, 2013, the following “anointing prayer” was read over.
The government is being shut down so that God’s bankers can bring Jesus back. In an editorial published in the Washington Post on Feb. 4, on the heels of Cruz’s victory in the Iowa GOP primary, John Fea of the Religion News Service published an op-ed piece noting the frequent references Ted Cruz makes in stump speeches to his father “the traveling evangelist” Rafael Cruz.
“During a 2012 sermon at the New Beginnings Church in Bedford, Texas, Rafael Cruz described his son’s political campaign as a direct fulfillment of biblical prophecy,” Fea wrote. “The elder Cruz told the congregation God would anoint Christian ‘kings’ to preside over an ‘end-time transfer of wealth’ from the wicked to the righteous. After this sermon, Larry Huch, the pastor of New Beginnings, claimed Cruz’s recent election to the U.S. Senate was a sign he was one of these kings.”
Fea noted that Rafael Cruz and Larry Huch preach a brand of evangelical theology known as Seven Mountains Dominionism. The name comes from Isaiah 2:2, “Now it shall come to pass in the latter days that the Lord’s house shall be established on top of the mountains.”
Fea commented that Rafael Cruz believes Christians must take dominion over seven aspects of culture: family, religion, education, media, entertainment, business, and government.
By identifying Ted Cruz as the “anointed one,” Rafael Cruz has designated his son as what he believes is God’s choice to lead an evangelical coup d’etat, such that, as Fea notes, “Cruz’s campaign may be less about the White House and more about the white horses that will usher in the God’s Kingdom in the New Testament book of Revelation, Chapter 19.”
For the full text with video and illustrations, See: http://eastorlandopost.com/ted-cruz-closet-pentecostal#sthash.NI1dj94v.dpuf
So to pull all this logic together, God anoints priests to work in the church directly and kings to go out into the marketplace to conquer, plunder, and bring back the spoils to the church. The reason governmental regulation has to disappear from the marketplace is to make it completely available to the plunder of Christian “kings” who will accomplish the “end time transfer of wealth.”Then “God’s bankers” will usher in the “coming of the messiah.”
The government is being shut down so that God’s bankers can bring Jesus back. In an editorial published in the Washington Post on Feb. 4, on the heels of Cruz’s victory in the Iowa GOP primary, John Fea of the Religion News Service published an op-ed piece noting the frequent references Ted Cruz makes in stump speeches to his father “the traveling evangelist” Rafael Cruz.
“During a 2012 sermon at the New Beginnings Church in Bedford, Texas, Rafael Cruz described his son’s political campaign as a direct fulfillment of biblical prophecy,” Fea wrote. “The elder Cruz told the congregation God would anoint Christian ‘kings’ to preside over an ‘end-time transfer of wealth’ from the wicked to the righteous. After this sermon, Larry Huch, the pastor of New Beginnings, claimed Cruz’s recent election to the U.S. Senate was a sign he was one of these kings.”
Fea noted that Rafael Cruz and Larry Huch preach a brand of evangelical theology known as Seven Mountains Dominionism. The name comes from Isaiah 2:2, “Now it shall come to pass in the latter days that the Lord’s house shall be established on top of the mountains.”
Fea commented that Rafael Cruz believes Christians must take dominion over seven aspects of culture: family, religion, education, media, entertainment, business, and government.
By identifying Ted Cruz as the “anointed one,” Rafael Cruz has designated his son as what he believes is God’s choice to lead an evangelical coup d’etat, such that, as Fea notes, “Cruz’s campaign may be less about the White House and more about the white horses that will usher in the God’s Kingdom in the New Testament book of Revelation, Chapter 19.”
For the full text with video and illustrations, See: http://eastorlandopost.com/ted-cruz-closet-pentecostal#sthash.NI1dj94v.dpuf
Clinton Security Beat Up Former CIA Presidential Briefer
The son of a bitch stood with his back to Hillary wearing a Veterans-for-Peace T-shirt, for God's sake.
How Billionaire Trump Neutered the Donor Class
Why Trump Haters Really Hate Trump
Or the bad manners.
Or the “beautiful” wall he says he’ll build.
There’s a different, more subtle reason why the Republican establishment, donor class, political operatives, and the news media in general hate Donald Trump. The reason can be found in a New York Times best selling business book,Stacking The Deck, by Wharton professor David Pottruck.
Hate it with a PASSION!
That’s because when there’s a new way of doing things, a new way of solving problems, a new way of relating to everything, they feel threatened as a deep personal-loss. Change renders meaningless the value of their hard-won experience and know-how. In politics, it may means family member lose their cushy jobs and perks.
Student loans of government employees get automatically paid off by government – TAX FREE. Those in government have done things one way forever. Change is NOT FAIR to them. Everything they have done to line their pockets is threatened. The rules of the game may no longer apply. So they dig in their heels and will do whatever it takes to resist change.
They resist perpetually until forced otherwise.
They subvert any process that would lead to change.
Until they lose, it becomes open warfare against the people to sustain the establishment and its perks.
And so it is with Donald Trump.
Like him or not, he has completely rewritten the rules of Presidential politics. He bypasses the media, taking his message, raw and unfiltered, to the millions of people who follow him on Twitter.
The party establishment went from underestimating him and laughing at him to fearing him breaking out in night sweats. They fear all power and their relevance will vanish into thing air.
Donors gave Jeb Bush $120 million and he came in dead last.
The money, like Jeb, is gone and it could not save their fiefdom.
Now wealthy donors have a choice. Oppose Trump and he wins and they are out in the cold.Understand there is a change in the wind and shift sides to the people.
How ironic. It took a billionaire to neuter the billionaire donor class.
Most of the media hates Trump to the core and dislike the fact they are no longer able to play kingmaker losing their power fearing they will be irrelevant with the internet displacing them.
The political class have lost the power to rule behind the curtain from paid operatives and cronies who cannot transition to the new world where the old rules of campaigning don’t apply.
Trump has spent more on hats than he has on polls so the pollsters also have lost their importance.
Diplomats worldwide are running scared because Trump will renegotiate everything from a business standpoint that cannot be bought like Hillary & her foundation.
The handwringing, the dire predictions of doom, and the wailing and gnashing of teeth have little to do with Donald’s positions, but their loss of power.
They complain Trump is bringing in new voters who are not Republican. And this is bad?
The Trump threat isn’t to the Constitution, to America’s standing in the world, or even to Republican Congressional candidates, it is to the establishment.
If you think Trump’s supporters are angry about the way the government and the business world colluded, you are right. The establishment fails to appreciate the anger. They’re just furious. Even if Trump fails to win, there will be more in the wings. He is inspiring a change and he doesn’t even understand how profound.
It’s not the hair.
Or the bad manners.
Or the “beautiful” wall he says he’ll build.
There’s a different, more subtle reason why the Republican establishment, donor class, political operatives, and the news media in general hate Donald Trump. The reason can be found in a New York Times best selling business book,Stacking The Deck, by Wharton professor David Pottruck.
Pottruck, the Charles Schwab CEO who took the genial brokerage house online and into the big time, says that organizations hate change.
Hate it with a PASSION!
That’s because when there’s a new way of doing things, a new way of solving problems, a new way of relating to everything, they feel threatened as a deep personal-loss. Change renders meaningless the value of their hard-won experience and know-how. In politics, it may means family member lose their cushy jobs and perks.
Student loans of government employees get automatically paid off by government – TAX FREE. Those in government have done things one way forever. Change is NOT FAIR to them. Everything they have done to line their pockets is threatened. The rules of the game may no longer apply. So they dig in their heels and will do whatever it takes to resist change.
They resist perpetually until forced otherwise.
They subvert any process that would lead to change.
Until they lose, it becomes open warfare against the people to sustain the establishment and its perks.
And so it is with Donald Trump.
Like him or not, he has completely rewritten the rules of Presidential politics. He bypasses the media, taking his message, raw and unfiltered, to the millions of people who follow him on Twitter.
The party establishment went from underestimating him and laughing at him to fearing him breaking out in night sweats. They fear all power and their relevance will vanish into thing air.
Donors gave Jeb Bush $120 million and he came in dead last.
The money, like Jeb, is gone and it could not save their fiefdom.
Now wealthy donors have a choice. Oppose Trump and he wins and they are out in the cold.Understand there is a change in the wind and shift sides to the people.
How ironic. It took a billionaire to neuter the billionaire donor class.
Most of the media hates Trump to the core and dislike the fact they are no longer able to play kingmaker losing their power fearing they will be irrelevant with the internet displacing them.
The political class have lost the power to rule behind the curtain from paid operatives and cronies who cannot transition to the new world where the old rules of campaigning don’t apply.
Trump has spent more on hats than he has on polls so the pollsters also have lost their importance.
Diplomats worldwide are running scared because Trump will renegotiate everything from a business standpoint that cannot be bought like Hillary & her foundation.
The handwringing, the dire predictions of doom, and the wailing and gnashing of teeth have little to do with Donald’s positions, but their loss of power.
They complain Trump is bringing in new voters who are not Republican. And this is bad?
The Trump threat isn’t to the Constitution, to America’s standing in the world, or even to Republican Congressional candidates, it is to the establishment.
If you think Trump’s supporters are angry about the way the government and the business world colluded, you are right. The establishment fails to appreciate the anger. They’re just furious. Even if Trump fails to win, there will be more in the wings. He is inspiring a change and he doesn’t even understand how profound.
Tuesday, March 8, 2016
Killing the Sovereign, Democratic, Nation State
What is a sovereign nation state?
It is a human community that asserts its exclusive right to the occupation of a territory — the assertion of exclusive occupational right meaning the beating off of interlopers, whether they be armed invaders or economic immigrants. A sovereign nation state thus reserves the benefits of territorial occupation, however those benefits may be distributed within the community, to the indigenous population.
However, in today's politically correct Western world, such territoriality is treated as hateful xenophobia, bigotry and racism. Yet the defense of territory is normal and adaptive behavior not only in mankind, but throughout the animal kingdom. It is the means whereby individuals either alone, or in concert with their kith and kin, act to secure resources for survival and reproduction and thereby maximize their chance of being represented in succeeding generations.
Because the sovereign nation state excludes settlement by outsiders, its people exist in a state of reproductive and cultural isolation from the rest of humanity. Such isolation is never total, but is sufficient to result in genetic differentiation among nations resulting from founder effects, genetic drift, and local selective pressures. Isolation leads also to linguistic and cultural differentiation. A sovereign nation is a thus a population with a unique racial and cultural profile. It is, in other words, the basis of the beautiful racial diversity of the human species.
A democratic, sovereign, nation state is a sovereign nation state where the government depends in some measure upon the approval of the populace at large, which is to say a government that is perceived to rule in the interests of the people. Democracy in its ideal form, which is to say a government serving solely the interests of the people as a whole, is a fiction, since those who rule will invariably grant privileges upon themselves, and moreover, those most advantaged in society will seek to secure their advantage by using their advantaged position to skew the political process in their favor by means of bribery, blackmail or murder. Nevertheless, since the emergence of mass democracy in the 19th Century, more or less popularly elected governments throughout the West have established a vast range of public services designed to bring the benefits of education, healthcare, police protection, and the higher culture to the masses.
Today, however, the advantage of the most advantaged over the mass of humanity has never been greater, this being so not only because wealth has never before been concentrated in such vast amounts, but also because technology, not only in the physical sciences but also in the social sciences, makes elite control of the masses easier than ever before. Naturally, therefore, the most advantaged, which is to say the plutocratic elite or Money Power, seeks to wrest control entirely from the hands of the people and establish absolute ownership of the resources of the World. To this end, the sovereign, democratic, nation state, as an impediment to profit maximization (and mass impoverishment), must be eliminated, this objective being approached in two ways. First, the nation state as a racial and cultural entity is to be destroyed. Second, powers of government are to be transferred from national goverments to global institutions such as the UN, the World Bank, the WTO, NATO, etc., all of which will be controlled by the Money Power via its existing hold over national governments and more directly by bribery, blackmail or murder.
The destruction of the nation state is a work in progress, the chief instrument of which is mass migration, particularly from the essentially undemocratic Third World to the most powerful democratic nation states, which are those of the West. In this way, the solidarity of the people is destroyed. In addition, reproductive failure of the indigenous population is induced through sex "education" and mass entertainment that serves to promote the vice and perversion that Thomas Malthus recognized as an alternative to starvation as a way of limiting population. As a consequence of such methods, the fertility of all Western nations has already been reduced far below the replacement rate, which means that, as a consequence of immigration, the people of the Western nations will soon be replaced as the majority in their own homeland by people from elsewhere. In London, and other major urban centers, the English are already a minority in their own home. This is a high-tech, stealth genocide, conducted in the name of liberal anti-racist values: no blood, no gas chambers, just psychological manipulation leading to self-hatred, reproductive failure, and ultimate self-annihilation.
By destroying the homogeneity of the nation state through mass immigration, the notion that the government of, say, France or Germany or the United States should operate in the interests only of the French, or the Germans, or the Americans is undermined. People from outside the territorial limits of the nation state, it is asserted, have as much right to enjoy the accumulated cultural and physical capital of a country such as Britain, as the descendants of those by whose sweat and ingenuity the wealth of the nation was created. This globalizing tendency gains further momentum from the immigrant communities, which, loyal to the nationalist sentiments of their ancestors, lobby for their own cultural and racial interests, including those of their co-nationalists abroad, thereby further destroying the sovereignty of the invaded community.
To combat the resentment of the indigenous community so disrupted, the elite impose a system of speech regulation or political correctness, first imposed in Russia by V.I. Lenin, and culminating there in the Stalin terror that killed millions, for nothing worse than a muttered word of dissent.
In the West, political correctness serves chiefly as a shield for the Treason Party and their agents, the Blair's, the Clinton's the JEB's and Rubio's, the latter intent on vast personal enrichment through service to the Money Power. Thus, to speak in opposition to mass immigration is defined as racism, and racism is defined as a crime. The process of thought control through political correctness has infinite ramifications, as illustrated by the deployment of police to intimidate a school pupil who used a school computer to check the immigration policy of a legal, democratic political party supported by a millions of citizens. And here's a quote on the subject of immigration from that party's election manifesto:
Britain is clearly finished as a Sovereign, democratic, nation state. Well done Tony Blair and the Tory Party.
Related:
Patrick Buchanan: Will the Oligarchs Kill Trump?
Philip Giraldi: Hating on Trump
CanSpeccy: Will Donald Trump Trump the New World Order?
CanSpeccy: Universal Genocide and the New World Order
CanSpeccy: The Financial Times: The Ethnic Cleansing of the English From Their Own Capital City "Deserves Attention" LOL
It is a human community that asserts its exclusive right to the occupation of a territory — the assertion of exclusive occupational right meaning the beating off of interlopers, whether they be armed invaders or economic immigrants. A sovereign nation state thus reserves the benefits of territorial occupation, however those benefits may be distributed within the community, to the indigenous population.
However, in today's politically correct Western world, such territoriality is treated as hateful xenophobia, bigotry and racism. Yet the defense of territory is normal and adaptive behavior not only in mankind, but throughout the animal kingdom. It is the means whereby individuals either alone, or in concert with their kith and kin, act to secure resources for survival and reproduction and thereby maximize their chance of being represented in succeeding generations.
Because the sovereign nation state excludes settlement by outsiders, its people exist in a state of reproductive and cultural isolation from the rest of humanity. Such isolation is never total, but is sufficient to result in genetic differentiation among nations resulting from founder effects, genetic drift, and local selective pressures. Isolation leads also to linguistic and cultural differentiation. A sovereign nation is a thus a population with a unique racial and cultural profile. It is, in other words, the basis of the beautiful racial diversity of the human species.
A democratic, sovereign, nation state is a sovereign nation state where the government depends in some measure upon the approval of the populace at large, which is to say a government that is perceived to rule in the interests of the people. Democracy in its ideal form, which is to say a government serving solely the interests of the people as a whole, is a fiction, since those who rule will invariably grant privileges upon themselves, and moreover, those most advantaged in society will seek to secure their advantage by using their advantaged position to skew the political process in their favor by means of bribery, blackmail or murder. Nevertheless, since the emergence of mass democracy in the 19th Century, more or less popularly elected governments throughout the West have established a vast range of public services designed to bring the benefits of education, healthcare, police protection, and the higher culture to the masses.
Today, however, the advantage of the most advantaged over the mass of humanity has never been greater, this being so not only because wealth has never before been concentrated in such vast amounts, but also because technology, not only in the physical sciences but also in the social sciences, makes elite control of the masses easier than ever before. Naturally, therefore, the most advantaged, which is to say the plutocratic elite or Money Power, seeks to wrest control entirely from the hands of the people and establish absolute ownership of the resources of the World. To this end, the sovereign, democratic, nation state, as an impediment to profit maximization (and mass impoverishment), must be eliminated, this objective being approached in two ways. First, the nation state as a racial and cultural entity is to be destroyed. Second, powers of government are to be transferred from national goverments to global institutions such as the UN, the World Bank, the WTO, NATO, etc., all of which will be controlled by the Money Power via its existing hold over national governments and more directly by bribery, blackmail or murder.
The destruction of the nation state is a work in progress, the chief instrument of which is mass migration, particularly from the essentially undemocratic Third World to the most powerful democratic nation states, which are those of the West. In this way, the solidarity of the people is destroyed. In addition, reproductive failure of the indigenous population is induced through sex "education" and mass entertainment that serves to promote the vice and perversion that Thomas Malthus recognized as an alternative to starvation as a way of limiting population. As a consequence of such methods, the fertility of all Western nations has already been reduced far below the replacement rate, which means that, as a consequence of immigration, the people of the Western nations will soon be replaced as the majority in their own homeland by people from elsewhere. In London, and other major urban centers, the English are already a minority in their own home. This is a high-tech, stealth genocide, conducted in the name of liberal anti-racist values: no blood, no gas chambers, just psychological manipulation leading to self-hatred, reproductive failure, and ultimate self-annihilation.
By destroying the homogeneity of the nation state through mass immigration, the notion that the government of, say, France or Germany or the United States should operate in the interests only of the French, or the Germans, or the Americans is undermined. People from outside the territorial limits of the nation state, it is asserted, have as much right to enjoy the accumulated cultural and physical capital of a country such as Britain, as the descendants of those by whose sweat and ingenuity the wealth of the nation was created. This globalizing tendency gains further momentum from the immigrant communities, which, loyal to the nationalist sentiments of their ancestors, lobby for their own cultural and racial interests, including those of their co-nationalists abroad, thereby further destroying the sovereignty of the invaded community.
To combat the resentment of the indigenous community so disrupted, the elite impose a system of speech regulation or political correctness, first imposed in Russia by V.I. Lenin, and culminating there in the Stalin terror that killed millions, for nothing worse than a muttered word of dissent.
In the West, political correctness serves chiefly as a shield for the Treason Party and their agents, the Blair's, the Clinton's the JEB's and Rubio's, the latter intent on vast personal enrichment through service to the Money Power. Thus, to speak in opposition to mass immigration is defined as racism, and racism is defined as a crime. The process of thought control through political correctness has infinite ramifications, as illustrated by the deployment of police to intimidate a school pupil who used a school computer to check the immigration policy of a legal, democratic political party supported by a millions of citizens. And here's a quote on the subject of immigration from that party's election manifesto:
Britain is a compassionate, caring nation. In the course of our island’s history we have welcomed millions of people to these shores and we are proud of that record. UKIP does not have a problem with migration. What we do have a problem with is the uncontrolled, politically-driven immigration that has been promoted and sustained by Labour and the Conservatives.Wow! Is that racist or what?
Britain is clearly finished as a Sovereign, democratic, nation state. Well done Tony Blair and the Tory Party.
Related:
Patrick Buchanan: Will the Oligarchs Kill Trump?
Philip Giraldi: Hating on Trump
CanSpeccy: Will Donald Trump Trump the New World Order?
CanSpeccy: Universal Genocide and the New World Order
CanSpeccy: The Financial Times: The Ethnic Cleansing of the English From Their Own Capital City "Deserves Attention" LOL
Sunday, March 6, 2016
Crap Art: Prices Go Plop
 |
| Picasso: off £10 million since previous sale |
And it's the same, apparently, for much other modern "art," including Matisse, whose "Piano Lesson", which was expected to realize from £12 million to £18 million, was just knocked down by Sotheby's for a measly £10.8 million.
 |
| CanSpeccy: 20-Second Full Frontal Nude. Is this not worth as much as a Picasso? Who can really say? |
Some may say that ten millies is too much for 20 seconds' work — if you can call it work. But, as Picasso would have said, you are paying, not for 20 seconds' work, but for a life-time's experience.
All of which suggests the prescience of my December 2013 piece over at Wordpress, entitled: "Crap Art":
Crap Art:
Canspeccy.wordpress.com, December 16, 2013: What’s with the art market? Van Gogh was surely a genius. Still, why pay over $100 million for a painting of a bunch of irises when you can buy a bunch of real ones for a coupla bucks. Same with sunflowers. Just buy seeds and grow your own. |
| Three Studies for a Portrait of Lucian Freud. Source |
As for the nudes, surely they come cheaper in real life and may be cuter than a Modliani (last sale $73 million).
But now this: Francis Bacon’s portrait of Lucian Freud (at right). I don’t know if it’s a true likeness, but it makes Freud’s face look like a pile of dog shit. I mean, would you want that to adorn your dining room wall? And if so, why pay $142 million? Why not just scoop a poop and pop it on a silver tray as a dining-table center-piece?
 |
| Rubens: Massacre of the Innocents |
But is that the point? Is that the intended message? I’m so goddamn rich I can piss away $142 million on a load of crap? Perhaps, but that theory would surely make the late Kenneth Thomson, second Baron Thomson of Fleet, turn in his grave. He paid 49.5 million quid for the delicious throat-cutting, belly slitting, Massacre of the Innocents (snuff porn for the plutocracy), which was a lotta dough at the time. But the work is not crap. It’s by Rubens, who could certainly paint. Still, you gotta think it was the price that was intended to inspire awe, not the art.
Perhaps, though, there is something else going on here. Are we seeing the monetization of art? Like BitCoin for the hyper rich? A sort of invisible money beyond the purview of the taxman or Homeland Security, and lighter by far than gold — just roll it up, tuck it under your arm and take it with you wherever you want. And as a display of conspicuous consumption it’s better than stacking 100-ounce gold bars about the house, which would be crass — speaking comparatively, that is.
Does the canvas money theory explain the extraordinary price paid for the Freud portrait? It’s a triptych (or should that be tripshit?) Think how handy that could be: need some cash but not all $142 million or billion or whatever the thing’s worth today? No prob. Just clip off a panel (leaving you with a dipshit) and redeem one-third the value.
Related:
Crazy: Bacon's portrait of shit-faced Lucien Freud stolen
Perhaps, though, there is something else going on here. Are we seeing the monetization of art? Like BitCoin for the hyper rich? A sort of invisible money beyond the purview of the taxman or Homeland Security, and lighter by far than gold — just roll it up, tuck it under your arm and take it with you wherever you want. And as a display of conspicuous consumption it’s better than stacking 100-ounce gold bars about the house, which would be crass — speaking comparatively, that is.
Does the canvas money theory explain the extraordinary price paid for the Freud portrait? It’s a triptych (or should that be tripshit?) Think how handy that could be: need some cash but not all $142 million or billion or whatever the thing’s worth today? No prob. Just clip off a panel (leaving you with a dipshit) and redeem one-third the value.
Related:
Crazy: Bacon's portrait of shit-faced Lucien Freud stolen
Thursday, March 3, 2016
The Real Donald Trump
Donald Trump is a con man and failed businessman. He flies a Boeing 757 with his name on it solely to fool simple-minded persons into thinking that he is rich and successful.
At church, Trump habitually talks during the sermon, and steals from the collection plate.
Trump uses English at a Grade 4 level and his spelling is even worse.
He calls all women "fat pigs," "dogs," "slobs" and "disgusting animals," yet only marries actresses or high class models who for some reason seem to like him, even, or perhaps especially, when he's no longer married to them.
Trump calls all Mexicans, male and female alike, rapists, criminals and drug dealers, etc., and wants to have them completely walled off from America, but somehow he's managed to con the Hispanics of Nevada to make him their first choice in the Republican primary.
He calls all Muslims radical terrorists, rapists, bombers, etc., etc., yet he has somehow managed to become the most popular Republican presidential candidate among Muslim Americans.
Trump is a racist and white supremacist who has managed to gain more support among American blacks than any Republican presidential contender in living memory.
Trump's a fake Christian (Pope Francis, verified) yet he gets more support among Republican fundamentalist Christians than the supposedly genuine article, Ted Cruz.
Trump wants to be best friends with the richest man in the World, Vlad the Impaler Putin. And in a crass insult to past American statecraft, he claims that, by getting along with the Russkies, he will reduce the risk of nuclear war and stabilize the Middle-East. As if.
Then, to cap his fantastic foreign policy vision, he proposes to hand off responsibility for dealing with that Axis of Evil monster, Kim Jong-un, the madman of PyongGoneBonkers, to the world's other miniature regional power and nest of Commie bastards, China, as if those slitty-eyed folk could do anything.
Trump Claims that, as a business man, he bribed every politician alive, even Hillary, which is obviously a lie, since why, if it were true, would he have a bunch of politicians, including Hillary, running against him for the Presidency?
Trump thinks that Americans should make shoes and shirts, and computers and car parts for one another (and here), rather than buying them from American-financed sweatshops in Mexico and China. That way, he says, tens of millions of out-of-work Americans will get a decent job again. What he omits to say is that making Americans buy stuff from other Americans would raise the price of sneakers and jeans to the point where those with six-figure incomes would feel that buying stuff cost real money, which is preposterous.
Trump is a closet dipsomaniac and pot smoker, who pulls wings off flies and eats cookies in bed, and much more, as will be revealed in the next public statement by Mitt Romney.
Meantime, since Trump has so thoroughly wrecked their plans for a politically correct Union of Soviet Socialist American States, that William Kristol and the rest of the Neocons are threatening to emigrate to Russia and restart the Soviet Union.*
———
* This last claim may sound far-fetched, but it should be noted that at a meeting for GOP bigwigs and their tech-sector billionaire backers, remarks by William Kristol included repeated quotes from Karl Marks's Communist Manifesto:
William Kristol:
Assassinate Donald Trump Page Does Not Violate Face-Book's Community Standards
Neocon Warhawks Panic Over Trump Foreign Policy
At church, Trump habitually talks during the sermon, and steals from the collection plate.
Trump uses English at a Grade 4 level and his spelling is even worse.
He calls all women "fat pigs," "dogs," "slobs" and "disgusting animals," yet only marries actresses or high class models who for some reason seem to like him, even, or perhaps especially, when he's no longer married to them.
Trump calls all Mexicans, male and female alike, rapists, criminals and drug dealers, etc., and wants to have them completely walled off from America, but somehow he's managed to con the Hispanics of Nevada to make him their first choice in the Republican primary.
He calls all Muslims radical terrorists, rapists, bombers, etc., etc., yet he has somehow managed to become the most popular Republican presidential candidate among Muslim Americans.
Trump is a racist and white supremacist who has managed to gain more support among American blacks than any Republican presidential contender in living memory.
Trump's a fake Christian (Pope Francis, verified) yet he gets more support among Republican fundamentalist Christians than the supposedly genuine article, Ted Cruz.
Trump wants to be best friends with the richest man in the World, Vlad the Impaler Putin. And in a crass insult to past American statecraft, he claims that, by getting along with the Russkies, he will reduce the risk of nuclear war and stabilize the Middle-East. As if.
Then, to cap his fantastic foreign policy vision, he proposes to hand off responsibility for dealing with that Axis of Evil monster, Kim Jong-un, the madman of PyongGoneBonkers, to the world's other miniature regional power and nest of Commie bastards, China, as if those slitty-eyed folk could do anything.
Trump Claims that, as a business man, he bribed every politician alive, even Hillary, which is obviously a lie, since why, if it were true, would he have a bunch of politicians, including Hillary, running against him for the Presidency?
Trump thinks that Americans should make shoes and shirts, and computers and car parts for one another (and here), rather than buying them from American-financed sweatshops in Mexico and China. That way, he says, tens of millions of out-of-work Americans will get a decent job again. What he omits to say is that making Americans buy stuff from other Americans would raise the price of sneakers and jeans to the point where those with six-figure incomes would feel that buying stuff cost real money, which is preposterous.
Trump is a closet dipsomaniac and pot smoker, who pulls wings off flies and eats cookies in bed, and much more, as will be revealed in the next public statement by Mitt Romney.
Meantime, since Trump has so thoroughly wrecked their plans for a politically correct Union of Soviet Socialist American States, that William Kristol and the rest of the Neocons are threatening to emigrate to Russia and restart the Soviet Union.*
———
* This last claim may sound far-fetched, but it should be noted that at a meeting for GOP bigwigs and their tech-sector billionaire backers, remarks by William Kristol included repeated quotes from Karl Marks's Communist Manifesto:
William Kristol:
A specter was haunting the World Forum–the specter of Donald Trump. ...Karl Marx:
The key task now, to once again paraphrase Karl Marx, is less to understand Trump than to stop him.
A spectre is haunting Europe — the spectre of communism. ...Related:
Assassinate Donald Trump Page Does Not Violate Face-Book's Community Standards
If someone does shoot Trump, Melania should sue Mark Zuckerberg for a billion or two.Who does Mitt Romney's criticism of Donald Trump help? Seventy-four percent say Trump
Sunday, February 28, 2016
Humanity Is Not Wise, But Dangerously Inventive
Man is the Reasoning Animal. Such is the claim. I think it is open to dispute. Indeed, my experiments have proven to me that he is the Unreasoning Animal... In truth, man is incurably foolish. Simple things which other animals easily learn, he is incapable of learning. Among my experiments was this. In an hour I taught a cat and a dog to be friends. I put them in a cage. In another hour I taught them to be friends with a rabbit. In the course of two days I was able to add a fox, a goose, a squirrel and some doves. Finally a monkey. They lived together in peace; even affectionately.Our species, Homo sapiens, which is to say the wise ape, is as Twain observed, not only not wise but is in fact incurably foolish. But it is also terrifyingly inventive. That is the secret of humanity's domination of the planet. We engage in continuous innovation.
Next, in another cage I confined an Irish Catholic from Tipperary, and as soon as he seemed tame I added a Scotch Presbyterian from Aberdeen. Next a Turk from Constantinople; a Greek Christian from Crete; an Armenian; a Methodist from the wilds of Arkansas; a Buddhist from China; a Brahman from Benares. Finally, a Salvation Army Colonel from Wapping. Then I stayed away for two whole days. When I came back to note results, the cage of Higher Animals was all right, but in the other there was but a chaos of gory odds and ends of turbans and fezzes and plaids and bones and flesh — not a specimen left alive. These Reasoning Animals had disagreed on a theological detail and carried the matter to a Higher Court.
Mark Twain
At the outset, the process was more intermittent than continuous. Someone found that a pointed stick could be hardened in a fire, making a better weapon to spear a boar or pierce a threatening stranger.
Later, perhaps ten thousand years later, someone invented the bow and arrow. The first step, perhaps, was to tie a piece of buffalo gut to both ends of a slightly bowed stick and twang it to produced a novel sound with which to entertain the girls. Then, someone fooling around with a twang stick, found that the gut string, when stretched really tight could propel a stick or a stone. Then we were really on the ladder of progress. Next step: point the arrow and you've got a cool way of nailing a pigeon.
Somewhere along the line came various kinds of chipped stone tools, axes, knives and arrow heads. Then someone came up with the idea of catching fish with a worm tied to a length of twisted gut. Often, the fish would slip the line before it was hauled in. But after a few thousand years some genius came up with a small hook carved from a stag's antler or a piece of whale bone, which, when attached to a fishing line and swallowed with the bait, kept the fish on line as it was drawn out of the water. Yeah!
None of these innovations, individually, may have been beyond the intellectual capacity of a chimp, or an orangutan. But what made humans unique and gave them the capacity for continuous innovation was the gift of speech. The power of speech meant that what was conceived once could become common knowledge of the tribe and then the species.
In the early stages of human evolution, innovation affected life only marginally. People with fire hardened spears killed more game than people armed only with rocks, and so their numbers increased, but not by a lot. Likewise, those who developed fish hooks increased the quantity and quality of their food supply, and thus prospered. But it took nine-tenths of human history before people got the idea of settling down to cultivate the land and grow crops instead of relying solely on what they could hunt or gather, and by that time the world's entire human population probably still numbered less than a million.
But by increasing the carrying capacity of the land, farming increased the density of population. Urbanization became possible, and with urbanization the process of continuous innovation was greatly accelerated. Higher population density meant more ideas and faster transmission of ideas. Moreover, urbanization created greater opportunities for trade and for the division and specialization of labor, which led to competition, which concentrated minds on innovation for competitive advantage. Thus began the human population's exponential rise, doubling over shorter and shorter intervals, first ten thousand years, then a thousand, then a hundred, and today, just thirty to forty years.
With each leap in population, the intellectual effort devoted to the process of innovation leapt also, thus causing the human carrying capacity of the planet to rise exponentially. Among the more important innovations were writing (which facilitated the spread of ideas both contemporaneously and across the generations), calculating, and organized learning. What started out as a bit of fun with a stick and a piece of gut turned increasingly to nightmare. Incurably foolish men acquired toxic gases, lethal microorganisms and nuclear weapons capable of destroying virtually all life on the planet. What's more they went about replicating these weapons on a massive scale and devising means of delivering them to any point on earth at hypersonic speed.
That is where the mind of man has brought us: to the brink of extinction. Or rather one should say, that is where the mind, not of man, but of mankind has brought us, for the minds of individual human creatures are as feeble as they ever were, but linked in a vast network with other feeble minds, they achieve prodigious results leading us ever more rapidly to the point of extinction.
Related:
CanSpeccy: Why Are We So Smart? Or Perhaps We're Not
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)