tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5867260065662559631.post8450861775118231309..comments2024-03-01T18:36:20.048-08:00Comments on CanSpeccy: Does Anderson Cooper Want Professor James Tracy and/or His Family Members Harmed?CShttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03399620869685840906noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5867260065662559631.post-81931214364100183652013-01-12T21:02:46.549-08:002013-01-12T21:02:46.549-08:00But the financial sector certainly has massive con...But the financial sector certainly has massive control over the global economy. See <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21228354.500-revealed--the-capitalist-network-that-runs-the-world.html" rel="nofollow">the capitalist network that runs the world</a>.<br /><br />In his great work "Tragedy and Hope" the American historian Carroll Quigley <a href="http://www.wanttoknow.info/articles/quigley_carroll.tragedy_hope_banking_money_history" rel="nofollow">wrote</a>:<br /><br />"The control of financial capitalism was used to integrate the industrial system into ever-larger units with interlinking financial controls. This made possible a reduction of competition with a resulting increase in profits. As a result, the industrial system soon found that it was again able to finance its own expansion from its own profits, and, with this achievement, financial controls were weakened, and the stage of monopoly capitalism arrived.<br /><br />In this fifth stage, great industrial units, working together either directly or through cartels and trade associations, were in a position to exploit the majority of the people. The result was a great economic crisis which soon developed into a struggle for control of the state—the minority hoping to use political power to defend their privileged position, the majority hoping to use the state to curtail the power and privileges of the minority. Both hoped to use the power of the state to find some solution to the economic aspects of the crisis. This dualist struggle dwindled with the rise of economic and social pluralism after 1945."<br /><br />It appears that the capitalists are now back in a position to exploit the majority, and as Anonymous argues, they are naturally intent on setting up a form of government which allows the use of guns only by the plutocrat-owned state.<br /><br /><br /> CShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03399620869685840906noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5867260065662559631.post-89845946939299474052013-01-12T20:01:56.803-08:002013-01-12T20:01:56.803-08:00Hm. One thing to note is that there's no law t...Hm. One thing to note is that there's no law that says a banker has to be of a particular race or religion. <br /><br />But if we consider this without reference to race, religion or creed, you may nevertheless have a point, although I suspect that the forces propelling the the drive for global hegemony and the creation of a new feudalism are quite a bit more complex than you suggest. CShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03399620869685840906noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5867260065662559631.post-14688102264041110712013-01-12T16:37:06.050-08:002013-01-12T16:37:06.050-08:00Let’s say there’s a “working class” ditch digger. ...Let’s say there’s a “working class” ditch digger. He digs ditches for a living. Let’s say someone agrees to give the ditch digger a sandwich if he digs them a ditch. One ditch for one sandwich.<br />That is called “Trade”.<br />Let’s say at some point we all agree to recognize a certain amount of gold as being worth the same as someone digging one ditch and also worth the same as one sandwich. This enables the ditch digger to work for a third party and get paid one piece of gold – then go trade that piece of gold for one sandwich.<br />That is called using “Commodity Money”.<br />====<br />Now, let’s say we all agree that it’s a good idea to store our gold in a bank and have that bank issue receipts that we can use in our daily transactions. So, now the ditch digger works and get paid one receipt – then he goes to someone else and trades that receipt for a sandwich.<br />That is using a receipt as money.<br />======<br />Now, let’s say the bank is being run by a group of co-religionists whose religious doctrine instructs them to inflict the crime of usury on all others. So they start writing out receipts and loaning them out to people for repayment – plus interest. They also write receipts out to themselves and their co-religionists and they go around “buying” things with those receipts.<br />This is called “Organized Crime”.<br />=====<br />What do you think happens as a result of that?<br />Look around.<br />This is what happens. They own the banks, they own the media, they own your government, they own the large corporations.<br />========<br />Members of that group have a Monopoly on receipt writing and the governments they have bribed force us to use those receipts as “money”. They also “loan” those receipts out for interest. BTW, there’s no gold in that vault upon which those receipts are based. Those receipts are based on nothing. They are J**Paper. Might as well wipe your ass with it.<br />===<br />This crime is mathematically compounded by the practice of charging interest for the use Receipts-As-Money.<br />=====<br />"THEY" want to disarm you.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5867260065662559631.post-12258768858009596772013-01-12T14:33:43.801-08:002013-01-12T14:33:43.801-08:00Yes, he's a brave man, under attack from a hat...Yes, he's a brave man, under attack from a hatchet-faced media hatchet man. CShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03399620869685840906noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5867260065662559631.post-32984689637996594282013-01-12T09:54:15.935-08:002013-01-12T09:54:15.935-08:00Viva James Tracy.
- AangirfanViva James Tracy. <br /><br />- AangirfanAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com