tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5867260065662559631.post2696239147227552166..comments2024-03-01T18:36:20.048-08:00Comments on CanSpeccy: Time Is Neither Absolute Nor Does It Flow Equably, But It Does FlowCShttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03399620869685840906noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5867260065662559631.post-53707947037879502622016-08-24T08:42:10.736-07:002016-08-24T08:42:10.736-07:00I dunno. But the physicists who say they do know, ...I dunno. But the physicists who say they do know, point to the fact that sub-atomic particles accelerated to great speed in accelerators decay more slowly than particles at rest. <br /><br />There's also the experiment with atomic clocks, carried around the globe by commercial airliner, which tick a little more slowly than clocks at rest.<br /><br /> CShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03399620869685840906noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5867260065662559631.post-53479666908119781282016-08-24T02:35:48.931-07:002016-08-24T02:35:48.931-07:00I don't think this is right... Miles Mathis al...I don't think this is right... Miles Mathis also disagrees with this interpretation of relativity:<br /><br />Agreed it makes sense that when moving away from earth at (near) the speed of light time runs faster on earth relative to the spaceship, we all agree on that.<br /><br />BUT when moving towards earth (on the return journey) it then runs slower... I.e. the direction of travel makes a difference (of course!). This bit is inexplicably missed by the 'physicists'. Hmmm.<br /><br />So when the twin returns to earth, the same amount of time has passed for both. And they're the same age.<br />This symmetrical solution makes better sense that the asymmetrical one suggested by 'modern physics'. Which as you know I consider to be about as reliable and authoritative as the Bible.<br />:)<br /><br />Time-travel is nothing more than pseudo-scientific superstition.The Veritopianhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10023209314813899777noreply@blogger.com